Note that the current implementation fix the issue reported in the thread you reported. Now the name is reset if the parameters are changed so at leas we cannot say that the iop name is misleading. This was not proposed at the time. Note also that if you enter manually the iop name it won’t be reset. All in all the current implementation does not suffer the initial problem mentioned and this was really needed for the support of multiple auto-presets otherwise it would be difficult to see what has been applied.
4 Likes