Hello,
if I remember right, harry durgin talks in one of his videos about the settings of the base curve module from darktable version 2.3. - does somebody know, in which video?
Hello,
if I remember right, harry durgin talks in one of his videos about the settings of the base curve module from darktable version 2.3. - does somebody know, in which video?
And/or these ones?
http://weeklyedit.com/basecurves/
http://weeklyedit.com/playlist/?module=Base%20Curve
Thanks!
Addendum: with joy I have noted that the links I gave above are popular.
Unfortunately, weeklyedit.com seems depressed (= down) these days. ping @harry_durgin
However, you will be able to find many of Harryās tutorials here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LufwQZx01gk
Have fun!
Claes in Lund, Sweden
Donāt use the basecurve tool. Create a camera profile instead! A tutorial for that will be available on pixls.us soon.
Is ācamera profileā already implemented in DT? Basecurve has preset āPanasonic likeā but I guess it was created for particular model and when I apply it to my GX7 photos first thing I notice is that photos need circa +0,3EV exposure as they are dark. If I can make such a profile for GX7 please let me know, Iāll try to create one and send it to developers.
edit: in links above there is video by @harry_durgin with tutorial how to create ābasic curveā profiles for each ISO setting. Unfortunately, itās done on linux so I can only provide samples to create profiles.
Hi Gobo,
yes, camera profiles are supported by darktable! The basecurve has been generated for Panasonic cameras in general. If you want a profile for your camera, you should create a camera profile and share it.
Iām sorry, but Harry his videos are incorrect.
Please read PIXLS.US - Profiling a camera with darktable-chart
Andreas, Iām trying to work through the process of profiling my camera. Whereas I truly appreciate your in-depth article, there are a few things which arenāt very clear. Perhaps you can clarify?
Letās start off with why you feel that Harry Durginās video tutorial is incorrect. Iām sure that by explaining this your answer will likely augment that which is already in your article! More knowledge is a good thing. It will probably fill some of the current holes in the general level of understanding.
Letās move onā¦
Iām using the Color-checker Passport. You note that itās important to have an L-value of 96 for the neutral white patch. Iāve noticed that this is dependant upon exposure.
You say ādisable most modules, especially the base curve!..ā.
You mention that one must create a custom white balance before taking the profile shots. In the instructions you include āIf your camera has a custom white balance featureā¦ā
With regards to darktable-chart, you say āNow it is time to start darktable-chartāā¦
Iāll finish-off with a personal observation: I donāt give a ratās butt about what the OEMās designers feel that my unprocessed fotos should look either in-camera or prior to post. Hence, I donāt care if my fresh RAWs donāt look like the OEMās jpegs. I simply want my baseline to reflect (hah: a pun!) real-world colours. From there itās only up to me to begin doing funky things
Letās start off with why you feel that Harry Durginās video tutorial is incorrect.
- What does one do if none of the Raw photos in the set of ever-increasing ISOs are exposed so as to give this value?
Redo the photos with better conditions!
Quoting the article: If the value displayed in the color picker module matches the L-value of the field or is close (+0/-2. This means L=94 to L=96 is acceptable), give the RAW file and the corresponding JPEG file 5 stars.
- If say, only the ISO 100 exposure produces this value but the subsequent shots do not, what is one to do? (The L-values on all of my shots are unique).
Then only use the ISO 100 exposure which is fine to apply for other ISO values too.
You say ādisable most modules, especially the base curve!..ā.
What do you mean āmostā?
None is the best (beside the once you canāt disable )
- Which ones can remain?
Orientation; Crop & Rotate, Lens Correction (if required)
- Which ones other than the base curve must not be enabled?
All which manipulate the image in color or tone. Orientation and Crop&Rotate are fine.
Quoting the article: You can also crop the image but you need to apply exactly the same crop to the RAW and JPEG file! (This is why you use a tripod!)
You mention that one must create a custom white balance before taking the profile shots. In the instructions you include āIf your camera has a custom white balance featureā¦ā
- If the camera doesnāt, what is one to do?
Auto White Balance (AWB)
- Like most, mine has a custom white balance feature. However, following from the above, can one correct the white balance in post by using dtās White Balance module without compromising the profiling workflow?
No, you canāt! You created a JPEG which is a developed picture with the applied White Balance your camera used!
With regards to darktable-chart, you say āNow it is time to start darktable-chartāā¦
- I think that more than a few people would appreciate greater details explaining how this is to be done from the Command Line
I donāt see why. You donāt need a terminal to start darktable-chart.
If it is not packaged, contact the packager and report a bug!
Hence, I donāt care if my fresh RAWs donāt look like the OEMās jpegs. I simply want my baseline to reflect (hah: a pun!) real-world colours.
Then match against a CIE file.
Andreas
[P.S. Iāve sent a request to update the article on pixls.us]
Thanks, Andreas! Itās becoming more clear now. Yet, the waters are still a bit turbid ā¦
Surely this doesnāt matter if all one wants to do is match against the CIE file, right? Furthermore, if this is oneās end goal, there isnāt really a need to shoot any jpeg files, correct?
Great! Alas, Iām not quite sure how to run it . Any hints?
Surely this doesnāt matter if all one wants to do is match against the CIE file, right? Furthermore, if this is oneās end goal, there isnāt really a need to shoot any jpeg files, correct?
Iām sure you will find out and then can report back
Great! Alas, Iām not quite sure how to run it
Looks like it doesnāt come with a desktop file, which is worth a bug report ā¦
Open a Terminal and type: darktable-chart
If this doesnāt work, blame your packager
Sorry; Iām not quite sure about the following eitherā¦
Hmmā¦ I donāt think that itās a good idea to trust Auto Anything! If the cameraās AWB isnāt indicative of the real world and oneās goal is to produce a real-world profile, then it seems that the poor suckers who are without the ability to customise White Balance, are left holding the short stick. With this in mind, Iām hoping that what I think that Pascal de Bruijn is doing is, in fact, acceptable.
So, are you saying itās okay to use incorrect L-values on the other photos? Or, are you saying that one must just use the ISO 100 profile regardless of the actual ISO conditions of other photos? The latter kinda defeats the purpose of the exercise, doesnāt it?
Wow. Seems to me that this could be a day-long exercise of chasing oneās tail in an on-going effort to tweak untold variables until one arrives at an acceptable L-value. But, if this is the price that one must pay, well, this is what will be doneā¦
Well, I was kind of hoping that you as the apparent āexpertā would shed some light onto this, Andreas. Hence the request for verification of what are merely my assumptions
I choose to look at him as adding what he knows to our collective knowledge base. You can do the same.