I am interested to test how different raw converters process the same raw image data regardless of camera/lens make/model. That’s why I am not really interested in testing the combination of in-camera software + raw converter but only raw converter. Of course different cameras have different qualities but I don’t think that WB, gamma curve or demosaic are camera dependent algorithms (in case of same bayer pattern). Correct me if I am wrong.
What I am asking is not directly related to RT per se although it will be part of the test of course.
I am using RT mainly on Linux but I have it on Windows too. Never crashed.
Some time ago I made a very simple test, comparing different raw converters:
This was based on using real raw file, from a camera. However it is fairly limited and obviously testing with lens imperfections (vignette etc) or without the possibility to have a clean linear gradient it is somewhat skewed. So my idea is to use a synthetic raw so I can take it further, test not only gradients but also different other patterns.