True, but I have learned from a set of other, consistent, responses, that I have an inappropriate expectation of the manual. Sadly, I find that the discussions that I am referred to here are actually further examples of the sort of impenetrability that I find in the user manual: I end up with feeling that I know less now than I did before reading; that there are too many clauses/phrases that, to me, are ambiguous or of questionable logic or contradictory; or that pre-suppose - recursively, ad infinitum - an existing set of knowledge/understanding which, if I possessed, would render it unnecessary for me to read in the first place. Result: I fail to get a clear understanding
And it is this repeated experience that creates in me the feeling that I have stumbled, unwittingly, into a macho aficionado’s Christmas party, at which I consistently fail to demonstrate that mine are as big as yours. This is, uniquely, a characteristic of a male dominated ‘universe’; why does it have to be this way?
Apologies, that’s just a rant. I get carried away in my interpretation of the word ‘discuss’.