Is darktable 5.2 a lot slower?

Software darktable
1

I installed my pc new with Ubuntu and did a test.

The test output looks a lot different now. With dt 5.0 I had about 1.5sec for the gpu, an Intel B580. there are somwher logs with this pc in other discussion. If you want, I will search.

See log attached.

Now I remember a warning in this forum re this driver, I have to search for this discussion.

Please see the log attached.
intel_bmg_g21_ryzen_9_7900_darktable-cli_setubal.orf_setubal.orf.xmp_setubal.jpg_–core_–disable-opencl_-d_perf.txt (5.2 KB)

2

I recommend searching first and if you can’t find a solution, then post a question.

Your log tests the performance via disabling opencl. It seems you want to compare the performance to a system with opencl (GPU). Why compare apples to oranges?

2 Likes
3

Oh, I am so sorry using the wrong command. Everything is ok.

$ darktable-cli setubal.orf setubal.orf.xmp setubal.jpg --core -d perf -d opencl
...
     2.7521 [dev_process_export] pixel pipeline processing took 1.516 secs (2.361 CPU)
     3.5139 [export_job] exported to `setubal_01.jpg'
 [opencl_summary_statistics] device 'Intel(R) OpenCL Graphics Intel(R) Arc(TM) B580 Graphics' id=0: 197 out of 197 events were successful and 0 events lost. max event=196
4

Can’t answer your question refer a linux instal, but on Windows 5.2 not slower than 5.0 for me. I am now using 5.3 weekly builds and also not slower. It sounds like you were testing with OpenCL disabled. Is that the case?

1 Like