Likely a good call not to identify someone but also at the same time this discussion is a bit empty without any examples like some others posed at times on this forum esp ones with such a possible subjective bias. Without an example or 2 you might be right (as judged by a majority on this forum) or you might be blowing smoke out your %#$ based on your bias of what a “good” wildlife edit is.
Even with examples there would be tremendous latitude for debate.
So I am neither agreeing or disagreeing with you but this is about photographs and when we have these topics IMO if there are not examples then what is there to discuss…