That’s true, which is why I talked about how he reviews the technical aspects of a lens that can be seen. His portfolio of reviews doesn’t cover everything and not all lenses are subject to the same level of scrutiny, so I would like to find reviewers with the same philosophy. Or else I would be stuck googling for “X lens photo of fountain” etc. Some reviewers (I will not name them, there are many) simply gush about the lens and provide like 3 photos in unchallenging lighting at such a low resolution that we are unable to see things like onion ringing. Others are obviously only showcasing the good side of a lens (especially vintage lens, if you see a post written by a russian person about a russian vintage lens…)
I have never put any stock in any of the subjective comparisons that lens reviewers write up, I prefer to look at the examples and draw my conclusions from there.