Libre Arts - 8 audio editors for Linux that are not Audacity

Over the past few years, you might have seen a number of posts that attempted to list audio editors for Linux. Pretty much every time whoever made those lists, would start with Audacity, maybe pay a small tribute to non-free Ocenaudio, then immediately exhaust themselves and start listing Ardour, Rosegarden, LMMS, Mixxx, and even Guitarix — none of which are audio editors, of course.

Even last year, when new Audacity owners were under fire for how they managed community relations (it’s so much better now), the attempt to list alternatives would be just about the same. Meanwhile, the world of Linux audio is a little fancier than that.

So let’s review 8 free/libre audio editors for Linux that are not Audacity or one of its pride forks. Before we proceed, here are some of the bare minimum features I think any generic audio editor should have to be really useful:

  • Be able to open and play an audio file at its actual sample rate, as well as resample
  • Be able to record an audio file from whatever input you selected
  • Provide basic copy/cut/paste features, preferably with optional crossfading
  • Be able to find zero crossing to make a clean cut
  • Make it possible to swap channels and work on channels separately
  • Visualize audio spectrum and loudness
  • Normalize to dBFS or, better yet, to LUFS
  • Fade in and fade out
  • Provide some way to remove noise, humming, clicks etc.
  • Provide basic filters like compression and equalization
  • Support common effect APIs

Of course, people don’t develop just generic audio editors. Some applications will gravitate towards analysis and some — towards a particular set of effects. It all depends on what problems the developer tried to solve.

The audio editors I picked are not everything there ever was. Oldtimers will probably recall GNUsound, Marlin, GLAME, GNoise, and others. None of them have been maintained for over a decade. So I’m only sticking to what seems to keep getting updates, however scarce.

I’ve always felt that Conrad Parker developed Sweep for the sole purpose of scrubbing audio. I mean, it even has sqeaky Clippit’s cousin Scrubby!

Sweep really sticks to the very basics: cutting/pasting, simple channels manipulation, LADSPA effects, recording. There’s not much to look at past that.

In early 2000s, Sweep was one of those runner-ups to Audacity. It gradually fell into oblivion at the turn of the decade. Active development ceased around 2012. However, the program still receives small fixes, builds on modern distributions from git and works — up to a point. What I mean by that is that it crashes a lot. Given that it used to be more stable back in the day, I strongly suspect some bitrot happening.

Pros:

  • No-brainer UI, most features are easy to locate
  • Works very fast

Cons:

  • GTK2, not great on HiDPI displays
  • Crashes way too easily
  • Only supports LADSPA plugins, no VST/VST3/LV2/CLAP

Verdict: needs some real love before it can be recommended.

I’m rolling mhWaveEdit and its fork called gWaveEdit into one item here because they are pretty much the same software.

Gabor Karsay and wdlkmpx picked up mhWaveEdit (originally developed by Magnus Hjorth) in early 2020, renamed it to gWaveEdit and did a lot of refactoring to modernize the code base. But they didn’t really add any new features.

Both mhWaveEdit and gWaveEdit cover most basics. If all you do is trimming, doing a few fades and applying a few effects, both applications are right up your alley. You’ll need a keen mind to do a few adjustments though. E.g. there’s no Silence/Mute command per se, but once you know that the program has a Fade effect, and you can input any number between 0% and 100%, all you gotta do is use 0% for both the beginning and the end of the selection.

Since mhWaveEdit hasn’t seen any commits since 2019, it’s probably best to stick to gWaveEdit which was last updated in March 2022. Unfortunately, since no releases have been tagged yet, you’ll have to build from git.

Fun fact: in 2004, mwWaveEdit’s code base served as inspiration and learning material for Mark Tyler who developed mtPaint.

Pros:

  • The very basics are there
  • The user interface is straightforward

Cons:

  • No releases since 2018, you need to build from git
  • No spectrograms
  • GTK2, so a few HiDPI issues are there
  • Only LADSPA effects supported

Verdict: very efficient for basic tasks.

KWave is another beginners’ audio editor developed in the KDE ecosystem. You can place markers, cut and trim audio, apply fades and low/band pass filters, record on schedule (no less!), you can even look at a sonogram (rendered in a separate dialog), but you can’t use any plugins.

There’s nothing particularly wrong with it, it’s just you’d expect more from a program that has been around since 1998. On the other hand, apart from build ennvironment fixes, KWave hasn’t seen real development action since 2020.

Pros:

  • Stable, works as expected, no major grievances
  • Has a handful of useful basic effects
  • Can record on schedule, with a timer and a volume threshold

Cons:

  • Too few processing capabilities

Verdict: stable and Just Works™ for a limited number of use cases.

ReZound is a brilliant piece of software that was fairly decent 15 years ago and would hold up nicely even today, was it not semi-abandoned. There are many things I love about it: the no-nonsense user interface, the built-in effects, the reliance on shortcuts, and more.

Feature-wise it seems to be originally targeted at preparing audio to be burned on CDs (and actually burning them, if you build it with cdrdao support).

The user interface is built with FOX Toolkit. Davy Durham made an attempt to port it to Qt5 back in 2017, but that project didn’t go very far. And this is where I have to applaude Marc-Alexandre Espiaut. In early 2022, he was apparently looking for an audio editor to hack on, tried his hand with mhWaveEdit and gWaveEdit, contributed some fixes to Sweep, but ended up porting the entire codebase of ReZound to Qt6.

The port works fairly well, there are a few rendering issues where the canvas fails to update location marker properly, so you get a ton of those until you re-zoom. But it’s mostly usable. I really do hope there would be a release sooner rather than later.

Pros:

  • Convenient user interface
  • Very usable built-in effects
  • Support for LADSPA
  • Named markers with snapping
  • Macro recording

Cons:

  • Does not support VST/VST3/LV2/CLAP
  • Currently needs a dated UI toolkit
  • Does not support HiDPI displays
  • Audio scopes not really usable because of their size, especially on HiDPI
  • The software is barely maintained

Verdict: very capable and rather stable, I have high hopes for the Qt6 port.

EKO by Petr Semiletov has the basics mostly covered: there’s basic cutting, pasting, trimming etc., as well as a number of useful effects and channel manipulations.

But the really big difference is that it has the beginning of non-destructive effects. Sure, it’s really basic, there are only a few of those available and you can’t adjust settings once you close effect’s window, but you can stack multiple effects and enable/disable them. You can also “bake” an effect into the audio. How far Petr is willing to take this feature is not very clear.

Similarly, you can edit the gain envelope right above the actual waveform, then apply it via the menu (Apply > Dynamics > Apply volume envelope). The inconvenient part here is that you can’t listen to the effect the envelope makes before applying it.

Pros:

  • Has many of the basic features
  • Almost everything is discoverable
  • Has very basic non-destructive effects
  • Hasn’t crashed on me at all

Cons:

  • Does not support any common plugin APIs
  • Does not ship essential effects like compression and reverberation
  • Does not display a spectrogram

Verdict: it’s stable and really okay for very quick editing and simple adjustments.

Snd is the love child of Bill Schottstaedt from the Stanford university’s Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics. It is the one audio editor on Linux that I don’t get at all and I’m not scared to admit it! This could have something to do with Snd being designed as Emacs for audio.

One could argue that in terms of usability it’s a typical academic program, but if you’ve seen Sonic Visualiser, you know that academic software in the audio domain can look and behave differently.

Long story short, it’s a capable editor and it can be scripted with a variation of Scheme (similarly to e.g. GIMP). But some of its functions are not discoverable at all and many (think LADSPA plugins) are only accessible through scripts in Scheme or its interpreter console called Listener. Moreover, because it’s targeted at studying music, the features related to cutting audio are really basic.

The alternative GTK-based user interface was removed in September 2020 because the main developer found it too difficult to keep up with GTK3 development and wasn’t fond of GTK4 at all. So the user interface is still built with Motif. But it’s blazing fast. When you open a WAV file, however large, you don’t get any of that “loading 47%” nonsense, it just opens instantly.

Of all the audio editors in this overview, Snd is the best maintained one. Sure, changes are small and mostly related to Scheme scripting these days, but releases are regular and the developer is around to answer questions.

The Scheme variation called s7 that Snd uses is a whole lot of fun. People use it for all sorts of things and go as far as scripting Reaper from Emacs, no kidding.

Pros:

  • Really, really fast
  • FFT transformations readily available
  • Customizable sonogram/spectrogram rendering
  • Basic markers implementation

Cons:

  • Editing features are too scarce
  • Many features are only available through scripting API
  • Extremely cryptic user interface
  • Not scalable on HiDPI displays
  • Only LADSPA supported

Verdict: amazing in academia, but probably not something you’d use in a studio.

GWC is a special kind of an audio editor aimed at cleaning up digital captures of vinyl records. So there’s no sense to expect amazing editing capabilities or even LADSPA support. What it does is denoising, reducing clicks, cracks etc. Even markers are implemented in a fashion that is very specific to working on digital copies of an entire vinyl side.

It’s slightly disconcerting that the last version that got actual filter changes was released in 2010. The vast majority of changes since then are UI tweaks, bugfixes, compliance to XDG, and suchlike. It might have something to do with project leadership change some years ago: basically, the original developer was no longer around and the project was picked up by a new contributor.

Pros:

  • Does exactly what it says on the box

Cons:

  • There are some weird bugs, one resulted in loss of data (it was overwritten on the disk without permission)

Verdict: good for what it’s designed for, but beware data loss.

I almost ended up listing seven projects, because that’s how many alive projects my research turned up (apparently, these days you just can’t walk around without hitting your toe on a cliché). WaveSurfer looks like a less capable alternative of Sonic Visualiser. But it does allow cutting and pasting audio (even pasting by mixing with the original content), which SV does not, so technically it is an audio editor.

In fact, WaveSurfer even has basic effects and can find zero crossing. But what it is designed for is, interestingly, things like IPA phonetic transcription. You can easily insert letters of the phonetic alphabet as new labels over audio. No wonder it comes from the Division of Speech, Music and Hearing (TMH) at KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm.

This neat set of very specific features is a little tarnished by not being able to listen to a portion of audio exactly at the point when you place to cursor on the waveform. So I’m not entirely sure how its actual users go about transcribing speech. It could have been fixed since the 2017 release, but only a macOS build has been released since then.

Pros:

  • Can do its own recording (no settings, just whatever is system’s mic input)
  • Has a handful of basic effects (fade, normalize, DC bias removal etc.)
  • Can display a spectrogram next to a waveform
  • Has its own plugin API

Cons:

  • Limited editing capabilities due to focus on transcription and analysis
  • Tends to throw errors at you, although you can skip them and continue working
  • No support for common plugin APIs (not even LADSPA)

Verdict: can be useful for some limited use cases that it has been designed around.

KWave, mhWaveEdit/gWaveEdit, and EKO are good simple generic audio editors that will most likely work for you if you need basic trimming and very little processing.

ReZound is the application you should seriously consider if you want more from your audio editor.

Snd and WaveSurfer work best in academic environment.

Gtk Wave Cleaner is mostly useful exactly for one use case: cleaning up digital captures of vinyl records.

The only program I can’t recommend at all is Sweep, and it’s only because it crashes just too much. Otherwise it’d happily join the ranks of KWave et al.

While some of these applications are still comparatively capable and usable, they are not aging very well. They do not support contemporary plugin APIs, so you don’t get access to much of what is available today, although some plugin packs like LSP do still ship LADSPA versions.

None of the editors in this overview measure loudness in LUFS which is a bit of a bummer. They mostly don’t work great (if at all) on high-density displays. Nor do they (except for EKO) allow stacking filters in a non-destructive manner. But above all, they mostly aren’t actively maintained, so chances of getting bugfixes and new features seem unlikely.

All this highlights the importance of the mission that Audacity developers have today. If they screw up in some major way (fortunately, this seems unlikely), we have very little to go on with. And if you’ve tracked the progress of Audacity’s forks, you know that developers are not rushing to implement new things. So given the current state of affairs, it’s either Audacity, of we have to beg Hermann Meyer for an audio editor in Guitarix.


This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://librearts.org/2022/08/audio-editors-for-linux-that-are-not-audacity/
5 Likes

TL;DR: Despite last year’s PR hiccup, Audacity is still king of the free audio editors.

4 Likes

Amen! :slight_smile:

I used Sonic Visualiser, along with OBS Studio to capture the Sonic Visualizer window, to create a nice audio visual scrolling spectrogram of some molluscs in a rock pool, using a DIY Hydrophone made from Piezo elements!

2 Likes

Nice! Which part of Earth did you record it at?

1 Like

@system, nice article. What’s your real name, Alexa? Alexa, while I have your attention, when my wife gets her next shipment of Mary Kay products, i want you to say, “lotion at the front door”… :laughing:

Seriously, a cite line with the author’s name would be nice.

My name, if that’s the topic, is in the featured image, when you read it on the website rather than on the forum :slight_smile:

1 Like

Pettycur Bay, near Kinghorn, Scotland.
Hopefully google map link works. https://goo.gl/maps/1Un5AZDH4RdohPja6

1 Like

There is much to like about Ocenaudio (which has been mentioned in the very first paragraph of the article all along), but it’s only free as in “money”. Hence not much representation here.

Well, I come, these days for Gimp and RawTherapee, but today, I’m giong home with a new audio editor. Ocenaudio.

I recall looking at it in the past and not taking the bait. I just installed it, and it looks just my balance of capable and simple. And it seems to work nicely with JACK.

Hardly ever edit audio these days, but looks like I’m keeping this one for when I do :slight_smile:

(My favourite audio editor was… I can’t remember the name… but it was powerful-simple before Adobe bought it and turned it into Audition)

That would be Cool Edit Pro :slight_smile:

1 Like

Yes, indeed. And I find that I still have a PDF of the manual.

1 Like