@mkmk The first ones seem to be a much more faithful/neutral scan of the negatives. The second ones are way to heavily processed. In either case, like others say, you should try to get 16 bit TIFFs from the first company (just ask them about it).
@mkmk The first ones seem to be a much more faithful/neutral scan of the negatives. The second ones are way to heavily processed. In either case, like others say, you should try to get 16 bit TIFFs from the first company (just ask them about it).