Slow internet today is making it hard to download the image file, but I will. However, I must say that I am not 100% convinced about selecting the modern chromatic adaptation in the preferences. For the most part my variety of cameras including canons produces a nice white balance as shot by camera. Using the legacy chromatic adaption means for most images I do not need to spend anytime adjusting white balance. However, I appreciate some images need white balance attention. Usually I can handle this in the legacy mode by using the temperature and tint sliders.
Now I am not saying I don’t have any appreciation of the Color Calibration module because I have great respect for it in the right circumstances in my work flow. With mixed lighting I can use multiple instances and masking to balance the color and that is not possible through the white balance module. Another great use of the CC module is the ability to measure color in one image and correct another image to this color. Just yesterday I was processing a picture of a boy shot in the highland village of Thailand and the white balance was off because of the challenging lighting. So I went back to another picture of a woman in Thailand with pleasing skin tone and measured the values of her skin. I returned to the image of the boy in the village and tried to correct using his face and the result was disappointing. I then selected a area of skin on his leg and got an excellent result. This is a great new feature added by AP.
I used this same feature to colour match the grass in three shots that I had taken and then exported the images to be stitched together by Microsoft Image Compositor Editor (ICE) into a panorama. BTW, us Windows users have a great option with ICE for stitching great panoramas together, Just export as 16 bit tiffs from DT before stitching and ICE will export a 16 bit tiff. If you get ICE to stitch the RAW files directly the best you can get out of ICE upon export is an 8-bit tiff (bummer).