Why aren't we utilizing embedded previews more in Darktable?

Absolutely not ignored (and thanks for your patience). Maybe misunderstood approach or not speak clear enough. Just looked for any method of showing embedded jpegs 1:1 which means “1 embedded jpeg pixel = 1 screen pixel”. Nothing more, nothing less and no matter what screen size/density. Inside DT, to have everything in 1 tool instead of culling in external software. All my remaining workflow (after selection) can be done with DT.

For Canons I use, Embedded jpeg size is 100% raw size. Of course you/I can “extract” more details from raw (especially with fur or feather) and that’s one of reasons we use raw, but jpeg is accurate enough to evaluate particular shot “delete or save”.
Even my Panasonic’s embedded 1920x1440jpeg (for 14Mpix sensor) is in most situations enough to evaluate a shot. If it was displayed pixel:pixel on screen.

First screenshot is embedded jpeg, scaled down, not up. When using Alt+W “sticky preview”.

Second screen is just that. Raw processed in culling mode and not scaled (“preview zoom 100%” - that it’s called in DT). Gives worst artifacts.
No matter which demosaicing method I choose for darkroom, I don’t get these artifacts, only time differs (and omitably small difference in details). 2-5 seconds to get full resolution not scaled preview in darkroom. In culling mode when I press shortcut for “preview zoom 100%” I get “scrapped” image as shown in second screenshot, in 40 seconds.

Third screen is Panasonic’s embedded jpeg, not scaled, shown by RT.
For picture evaluation/culling, embedded jpeg is worth more than artifacted preview produced in 40 seconds.

Thanks.
I use Rawtherapee for that purprose - it shows embedded jpegs shrunk to fit screen or not scaled 1:1 (jpeg pixel = screen pixel). Instantly. And it works. Quick cull, mark for delete. After culling whole session I delete marked pics with 1 operation. Raws that left in directory, I load to DT and process. Was searching to do the same in DT.