I can see where they come from. That part I think is easy when you look at the array of raw editors that people might have tried or used. If you look at something like ART or RT that by default turns on the auto-match tone curve the images are usually bright “contrasty” and saturated by default. I have not used Lightroom more than a handful of times but I have seen lots of videos. I do own ON1 which I don’t actually use that much and again you open the image and the profiles add a curve and color adjustments… The opening result for many images will not come close to that “expected” look in DT with the defaults (easily corrected) and for those just starting out this will be what many use as a first impression. It is far easier for those of us that have spent many hours using DT to understand that this is by design and that we are free to begin the editing with less formula applied and we have access to the tools to recover the image to that same point and beyond with not that much effort. Or just use the old basecurve.
I think its embracing this “workflow” paradigm as much as it is embracing the different tools or modules that has to be overcome and for some its off putting and they will not hang in there long enough to see the benefits and potential…
This will not go away any time soon…there are just different users with different expectations and the tools could be the best tools that could ever be invented but if the implementation doesn’t match expectations unrealistic or uninformed they will be critical.
I am often a bit puzzled at the extent of the discussion on this issue… To me its like watching television. If you don’t like what is on the channel you are watching just change the channel…