Is there a way I can test it myself?
Search dcraw.cc for
if( get2() != 17 ) // 17 is Standard light A
and replace it with
if( get2() == 17 ) // 17 is Standard light A
2 Likes
I’ll give it a shot. Problem is that my own builds are all borked right now, so I need to figure that one out first.
So this changes something. Colors are different and Temerature/Tint are read out as 1706/0.173 rather than 1500/0.87. Very promising!
Now the only problem i am left with is that my own builds don’t work properly.
Stable build, downloaded online: https://i.gyazo.com/63b5477eec8c933b7cbcec9ee5b31cf1.jpg
My own build of the latest data, no modifications: https://i.gyazo.com/c6552f7906d609b2f5c6ba88b4733bb8.jpg
Build with the modification as suggested above: https://i.gyazo.com/191274d92f3fd3aa732852749d6ffefc.jpg
You can see that there is a weird purple tint on my own builds. Any ideas how to fix that? This is my first time building anything, so it might just be a silly rookie mistake. I build for Windows 64 bit, simply following the guide on RawPedia.
Did you build using gcc 10.1? That’s a known issue. Just downgrade to 9.3
Edit: for reference:
It works also with gcc-10 of you disable the optimization option from the quoted bug.
Compiling with fno-tree-loop-vectorize is fine
I know that, as it was me, who bisected the compiler flags to that point. Though I don’t think we want to disable this vectorization…
2 Likes
Sure, it’s just a quick fix for the OP in case he cannot roll back the gcc. I have the problem because i compile on Windows with msys2. Once gcc was updated, I could no longer rollback.
I’m on msys2 as well. Rollback is no problem on msys2
Interesting, it did not want to do it for me. Can you please share what procedure have you followed to rollback?
Sure, do you still have gcc 9.3 in /var/cache/pacman/pkg/ ?
ls /var/cache/pacman/pkg/
yes, it is still there:
ls /var/cache/pacman/pkg/ | grep -i gcc-9.3
mingw-w64-cross-gcc-9.3.0-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
mingw-w64-x86_64-gcc-9.3.0-1-any.pkg.tar.xz
mingw-w64-x86_64-gcc-9.3.0-2-any.pkg.tar.xzpacman -U /var/cache/pacman/pkg/ mingw-w64-cross-gcc-9.3.0-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
Same for the other files, should revert it then
1 Like
No luck…
doing:
$ pacman -U /var/cache/pacman/pkg/mingw-w64-x86_64-gcc-libs-9.3.0-2-any.pkg.tar.xz
loading packages...
warning: downgrading package mingw-w64-x86_64-gcc-libs (10.1.0-2 => 9.3.0-2)
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: installing mingw-w64-x86_64-gcc-libs (9.3.0-2) breaks dependency 'mingw-w64-x86_64-gcc-libs=10.1.0-2' required by mingw-w64-x86_64-gcc
trying to remove first gcc I get:
$ pacman -R mingw-w64-x86_64-gcc
checking dependencies…
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: removing mingw-w64-x86_64-gcc breaks dependency ‘mingw-w64-x86_64-gcc’ required by mingw-w64-x86_64-libunwind
:: removing mingw-w64-x86_64-gcc breaks dependency ‘mingw-w64-x86_64-gcc’ required by mingw-w64-x86_64-uasm
and it continues like this.
I guess I will stay with the removed optimization and gcc-10 for a while. I did not noticed any performance hits anyway.
The good part is that I can report when the problem no longer appears with gcc-10 
by the way, sorry @MakeItColder for hijacking your thread
You need to downgrade the
Package as well. Have a look for the filename in cache folder. It also took a while for me to solve all the conflicts.
@Daniel_Catalina I had the same issues. You need to force the downgrade of gcc and gcc-libs (and maybe some others that I forgot) by setting -d which skips the dependency checks.
1 Like
gcc indeed was the issue causing the purple tint. Unfortunately I still cannot set the white balance under artificial light, even with a camera profile that accounts for the RYYB filter.
when yyou have interdependant packages, downgrade in the samle time
pacman -U …
You can also install the gcc8 package and configure cmake to use gcc-8 and g+±8. I don’t know if it optimizes less than with GCC 9, but it’s an easy fix and it works well for me.
Regarding the issue of not being able to set the white point properly: This can be fixed by using the Adobe DNG Converter on the DNGs, resulting in RT reading Temperature/Tint that makes sense and can be worked with. A camera profile to correct the colors for the RYYB filter is still necessary, but then it all looks accurate.
1 Like