Is it a joke or a typo? Excuse me, I am new here, though I have been enjoying darktable for several years already. I was planning to buy a Canon M50 and, as I use Linux exclusively, CR3 support is a crucial feature for me. If I can be of any help, I would be pleased to.
Neither.
I’m simply stating that by that year, with the possibility of 99.9%, it will already be supported.
Now, which release will be the first one to support that, i don’t know.
Thanks for reply. OK I am now on +50. There is difference but need to open outputs as layers and subtract them to see it. Checked output in EOM (Eye of Mate) and GIMP and preview is still way brighter than output. I am working on duplicate of image, Debian 9.6 Mate.
The behavior of collect images module has been changed. In RC0, you can use “%” as wildcard and if you type it in the entry box of “color label” and then press the Enter key, it will show images with any color label.
I also prefer the old way because I must do more typing and clicks, now.
But RC0 is more consistent. For example in 2.4 georagging is listing all pictures with and without geotag. Whereas, as you noted, the colorlabel collect was displaying only the picture with at least one colorlabel.
consistency seems like a good idea, except i would have liked it consistent the other way i guess, also because i’m a lazy typist (and it’s better for discoverability)
You should not use global tonemapping and filmic together, they do the same things but differently. Filmic has been designed to speed-up the process and avoid 4 different modules to do one thing: salvage the dynamic range.
This is what I get with exposure + filmic only (took me litteraly 45 s):