Extreme backlight

Interesting that you chose to obscure the sun entirely. Did you reduce the highlight rolloff point?

RawTherapee

DSC_5932_RT.jpg.out.pp3 (13.7 KB)

5 Likes

DSC_5932.nef.xmp (9.2 KB) DSC_5932_01.nef.xmp (10.2 KB)

3 Likes

Yeah, in scenes like this, I prefer to leave only the direct sun glow, which is more a less how I would see it with my eyes.
As for the highlight rolloff, it’s 0.597832

The result doesn’t look right when reproduced on the not as bright screen. (Mine isn’t HDR.)

My attempt using ART. Used log tone mapping, tone equaliser, tone curve and local contrast. A tricky one. Still room for improvement, but it looks sunny outside and work in the garden beckons now…


Extreme backlight.nef.arp (36.8 KB)

4 Likes


DSC_5932.nef.xmp (39.3 KB)

5 Likes

From earth ground, sun appears yellow to orange, depending of the thickness and composition of atmosphere travelled by sun light.
Thus, for my taste, I cannot find realistic a photo where the sun appears white, especially when sun is down on horizon.

1 Like

DSC_5932.nef.pp3 (14.1 KB)

Filmulator

highlight recovery 2
exposure 2.1
shadow rolloff 0.001
highlight rolloff 0.15
film area sf
black clipping point 0.004
shadow brightness 391
highlights brightness 777
vibrance 67
saturation 40

4 Likes

For me it’s kind of the opposite. When I directly look into the sun, it is most of the time pure white. But there is no point in discussing “realistic” for me, as everybody sees the world differently.

In a situation like this, where the highlights are just blown out, I do not try to attempt to bring or color or details where there is no information.
It’s just a matter of blending the clipped parts as gracefully as possible.

1 Like

Ah! yes, when you are on board ISS :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
Due to mainly rayleigh scattering, that cannot be true on ground.

The information is that from antiquity, sun was perceived as yellow/orange by human beings.

After that, it is an artistic decision. I have nothing against blue sun.

Yes, you are right :relaxed:

Like both of these, looks natural. All a question of taste though…

1 Like

Not easy :slight_smile: .


DSC_5932.nef.xmp (18.9 KB)

7 Likes

Man, this took way to long for a play raw image :smile: As mentioned by others: This one isn’t easy…


dt310.extreme.backlitght.nikon.d7000.xmp (18.2 KB) darktable 3.1.0

Thanks for the challenge!

10 Likes

DSC_5932.jpg.out.pp3 (12.0 KB)

2 Likes

Using dt 3.02, with exposure, filmic, color balance, two instances of local contrast and velvia.

Using dt3.2 nightly with filmic v4 and exposure set to +2.

DSC_5932.nef.pp3 (12.0 KB)

There is a small, but noticeable difference here between using ProPhoto and ACESp0 as working color space.

2 Likes

Nice shot, thanks for posting
Not easy, After multiple tests I came to an almost satisfactory version
DT 3.0.2


DSC_5932_01.nef.xmp (27.1 KB)

1 Like

Photoflow:

DSC_5932.pfi (42.5 KB)

2 Likes