In my fork I have experimentally built a RawTherapee for windows using skylake-raptorlake as the target processors, should be tuned to run fast on your i7. Further speed up is possible with the use of link-time optimization but that feature is not currently working for the windows build. (it does work on Mac and Linux)
Just tested myself you build (stand-alone) on Windows 11.
Processor: 12th Gen Intel(R) Coreā¢ i7-12700H (20 CPUs), ~2.7GHz
Memory: 32768MB RAM
Card name: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
It looks super fast.
No crash whatsoever so far.
Thanks a lot indeed!
@Silvio_Grosso appreciate your testing the product! Iāve only access currently to a Dude, you got a Dell! skylake machine running windows 10 and it also seemed faster than generic. I also have a Ryzen 9 5k to test on when I get back home in a couple weeks.
I tested with just a previous edit and just panning side to side. Using a crude timing method (stopwatch on my smartphone) I did multiple pans.
With threads set to 0, the processing bar showed up for about 2.5 seconds, but with threads set to 16 it was there for about 1.4 seconds.
@Silvio_Grosso can you please turn on Wavelet Levels > Sharp-mask and Clarity and try panning the image while zoomed in. And then try it again with Threads set to a higher number.
Just tried on an Acer laptop (Windows 11 - Kaspersky antivirus suite running in the background)
As usual: Processor: 12th Gen Intel(R) Coreā¢ i7-12700H (20 CPUs), ~2.7GHz Memory: 32768MB RAM Card name: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (RawTherapee does not take advantage of the GPUā¦) SSD: 1 terabyte - NVMe SAMSUNG MZVL21T0HCLR-00BT7
I tested some RAWs images from a Nikon D850 (NEF, around 45 Mb each)
As per your suggestion I activated: Wavelet Levels > Sharp-mask and Clarity
In all truth, I didnāt notice any difference, while panning (at 800% zoom), with the default settings (Performance > threads) versus, later on, increasing them to 20
I have repeated the test but this time I have released the mouse while panning in order to complete the OP every time.
The processing time was slower with 0 threads set in the performance. It was much faster with 20 threads with pretty much no delay (as expected, I supposeā¦)
Here is the recording (OBS running in the background)
although yours is even faster than mine, probably due to the extra RAM
Yeah. I suppose soā¦
32 Gb RAM was the minimun for me (in the past I run Windows computers with 16 Gb and I deemed them slow, especially for video editing stuffā¦)
Itās on my long term plan to upgrade RAM, but I just dropped a chunk of change on this computer and not ready to spend more at this time. The most taxing thing I use it for is RawTherapee. Besides that, itās basically web browsing.