Hi! And thanks for the suggestions!
- I’m working on that, at some point it will come… don’t lose hope!
- Definitely… that’s where the procrastinator that lives in all of us kicks in
- Samplers
a) I agree
b) sometimes it is not evident. For example, if you have your image in Lab colorspace and you want to sample in RGB, which RGB colorspace should be used?
c) ok, that’s doable
d) also doable, requires quite some work though… - It actually exists already, but the tool is not exposed in the UI. I will enable it in the next package I’ll produce.
- the working profile becomes also the output profile unless you insert a “colorspace conversion” layer at the top of the stack. Since the colorspace can be changed as part of the editing workflow, the working colorspace is kind of a dynamic concept. Anyway, soon I will introduce a more sophisticated “file export dialog” which will allow to chose an output colorspace as part of the export process. Most likely, the dialog will include soft-proofing of the output colorspace.
- I have put quite some effort into preserving the compatibility between the linear_gamma branch and the files produced by the stable one. The linear_gamma code should be able to open any file saved by the stable branch, but not vice-versa. When the PFI file includes tools that have been modified in the linear_gamma case, a legacy version is used instead to guarantee the compatibility.
- This is once more something that is in my TODO list since a while.