It would be strange if the majority of people posting here were not enthusiasts! But hey…
I find darktable mostly enjoyable and soothing to the mind. As a result, I spend a lot longer on each picture. With GIMP, I do production-line mode and minor-tweak jpegs quite quickly. That’s just me: I’m sure there is no reason that one can’t use dt in production mode. Pasting edits to similar pictures is a good start.
I also find that stuff that I have found very difficult in other software seems to be easy in dt. Masking, at least at the basic to middling levels, is just so easy to do. I’m still a bit baffled by some of the more advanced inclusion/exclusion stuff (Yes, I know: there’s a great video. One of Boris’s I think) and I have not begun on blend modes. I like that life and learning does not stop with a few sliders and a magic-wand button!
It is a bit sad that, when mentioning dt on DPReview to someone seeking a LR alternative, the suggestion is barely acknowledged. The person will probably install free-demo copies of several packages. Surely dt (or rt) is also worth an hour or three of their time? Especially as the “free demo” never expires ![]()
one has to try not to look like a FOSS Warrior! Which I’m not, anyway. I don’t have any personal barriers to closed, paid software. I have one criterion which I don’t want to change: Linux, not Mac or MS. And I’m not even trying to force that on anybody: if they are happy with Windows, let them keep it. It’s just that… <sigh!>
/my-2c-rant ![]()