It would be strange if the majority of people posting here were not enthusiasts! But hey…
I find darktable mostly enjoyable and soothing to the mind. As a result, I spend a lot longer on each picture. With GIMP, I do production-line mode and minor-tweak jpegs quite quickly. That’s just me: I’m sure there is no reason that one can’t use dt in production mode. Pasting edits to similar pictures is a good start.
I also find that stuff that I have found very difficult in other software seems to be easy in dt. Masking, at least at the basic to middling levels, is just so easy to do. I’m still a bit baffled by some of the more advanced inclusion/exclusion stuff (Yes, I know: there’s a great video. One of Boris’s I think) and I have not begun on blend modes. I like that life and learning does not stop with a few sliders and a magic-wand button!
It is a bit sad that, when mentioning dt on DPReview to someone seeking a LR alternative, the suggestion is barely acknowledged. The person will probably install free-demo copies of several packages. Surely dt (or rt) is also worth an hour or three of their time? Especially as the “free demo” never expires
one has to try not to look like a FOSS Warrior! Which I’m not, anyway. I don’t have any personal barriers to closed, paid software. I have one criterion which I don’t want to change: Linux, not Mac or MS. And I’m not even trying to force that on anybody: if they are happy with Windows, let them keep it. It’s just that… <sigh!>
/my-2c-rant