Hmm. Interesting question.
Most of that you’ll get by going to a camera with interchangeable lenses, if you do, the telephoto bit is going to need either a separate lens or a possibly bulky and compromised superzoom…
As has been said, there’s not very many ‘simple’ or low-end cameras on the market now, due to the ‘phoney’ takeover (hehe!). I don’t have anything against phones, but they’re certainly not appropriate for everything. Far from it.
I don’t know that I’m in a situation to give the input you want, as all my current kit is approaching 10 years old, most of it I bought second hand.
Are you open to buying used?
For a small yet fully featured camera, I rather like my old Sony Nex5r - current descendant would be the A6100, but that’s maybe a little expensive. The older A6000 could be good.
You mentioned the Fujifilm X100V, but have you considered their ILC (interchangeable lens camera) range - some of the less fashionable ones are relatively affordable - XE-2 springs to mind.
I have an Olympus OM-D EM5 mark II, which I like using but am not that impressed with image quality. I usually have mine paired with a 14-150mm (equivalent to 28-300mm on the m43 sensor) which doesn’t help the quality but is very convenient and light/compact for the versatility.
Methinks the problem (my problem!) is that your options are too open… when I want a new camera I’m usually restricted by the lenses and stuff that I already have.
By the way, when looking at manufacturer’s ranges, it helps to sort by price - some of the nameing schemes are confusing, but $ never lies…