WB after interpolation

Yes

1 Like

I think (and someone more familiar please correct me if I’m wrong), RT’s original whitebalance module was placed after demosaic so the user can regard the image in a ā€œdevelopedā€ state in order to make good decisions on modifying it. It was later discovered that some demosaic algorithms do better with a white-balanced input image, which led to this autoWB ->demosaic->removeAutoWB->userWB chain of processing. This solves the demosaic problem and keeps the operator-considered WB in a good place… ??

If you put the user-controlled white balance after demosaic, it improves responsiveness when adjusting WB because demosaic doesn’t have to be rerun.

1 Like

Ah, that’s the part I forgot about my short discussion with @heckflosse about it…

If yes, the story goes well. It may indicate that WB before interpolation has something good because you can also skip WB before demosaic by setting RGGB:1111.

Can you provide a source for your claim that most camera’s have WB before demosaicing?

As far as I checked patents about image processing with Canon and Sony, and press releases from Fujitsu, vendor of Nikon’s expeed, they all say that WB happens before demosaicing.

When Big 3 are in tandem, I think I can be allowed to say it’s ā€œmostā€.

There’s no need for a camera’s WB to happen after demosaicing because in-camera image processing isn’t really interactive.

1 Like

I fully agree with you.