Autumn in Norway

Hi everyone, I’ve been working with Darktable for a while, but I’m always unsure how to edit my images. I want to improve and increase my ability to analyze images and edit them accordingly. I am happy to receive criticism and am also looking forward to your edits and suggestions! Here I have a picture from our vacation in Norway, autumn 2023:

IMG_7730.cr2 (33.8 MB)

This file is licensed Creative Commons, By-Attribution, Share-Alike.

I’ve made two edits of this, but I’m not sure which image is more coherent, or let’s say which looks more genuine and realistic:


IMG_7730_03.cr2.xmp (47.8 KB)


IMG_7730_02.cr2.xmp (16.6 KB)

What would you make of the picture?

11 Likes

When I opened the image I was surprised how viberant the colors were, but presume that was reality.


(upload://fajYpNmFeSKHFc2FtZreVxGpqtr.xmp) (15.6 KB)

5 Likes


IMG_7730.cr2.xmp (10.7 KB)

2 Likes

IMG_7730.cr2.arp (16.8 KB)

2 Likes

Yes, the colors were very intense and bright. The light kept changing because it was alternately raining and then brightening up again. It was precisely this lighting mood that prompted me to take this photo.

I also like @age’s processing - the colors are nice and soft and balanced. The orange of the meadow should glow a bit more; I would now pull it up a bit more with a mask and the Exposure module.

1 Like


IMG_7730.cr2.xmp (20.8 KB)

3 Likes

I just appreciate your first take. It looks realistic. Very nice local constrast!

Here’s my try shifting colors to a complementary dual tone image. I think it looks more soft but also less realistic.


IMG_7730.cr2.xmp (20.5 KB)

2 Likes

Here is a second attempt in DT 5.1
Autumn in Norway.cr2.xmp (13.0 KB)

3 Likes


IMG_7730.cr2.xmp (15.2 KB)

Great image…quick edit here… you could take this one so many directions…

First image exported with HQR set to no and the second set to yes…

1 Like

Lovely picture, thanks for sharing it!

IMG_7730.cr2.xmp (15.4 KB)

And a moodier cropped version:

IMG_7730_01.cr2.xmp (20.5 KB)

6 Likes

I’m not much of a landscape photographer so what better way to stretch my brain than with someone else’s photo.


IMG_7730.cr2.xmp (27.9 KB)

I actually ran into some issues with this that I’m not sure about. I have a drawn mask to bring up the brightness in the foreground with color balance RGB. In the clouds just above the lowest part of the horizon there’s some highlights that were getting affected even though they are outside the boundary of the mask. The feathering is clearly expanding the mask beyond the outer ring of the path. I guess I assumed that outer line was a hard cutoff for the mask, as I’ve never noticed the mask overlay showing outside that line.

2 Likes

Turn on the mask display to check.
Also, if you use mask refinement, that may extend the mask if it finds some surface extends beyond the set boundaries.
If you need more explanation, please open a new thread, let’s not sidetrack this one.

1 Like

Wow! I so love the range on the left, seemingly like an ocean wave about to break into the valley! A magnificent capture, and - as mentioned previously in this thread - with so many possibilities! Thanks for the play


IMG_7730.cr2.xmp (9.0 KB)

5 Likes

IMG_7730_01.cr2.xmp (31,9 KB)

(I used AgX for this edit)

6 Likes

I prefer the sky on the image ending 02_01 and the foreground on the image ending 03.

To me the colours aren’t right in the foreground of the image ending 02_01. Possibly too much saturation.

Whatever my thoughts, it’s a great shot and one I would have been proud to have taken ! I plan to have a go at editing this when I’ve more time.

1 Like

Regarding critiques:

Your edits are lively and all in all very nice. The foreground on both edits are nearly identical. The skys are very different. The second version of the sky is in my opinion much better. The first one looks like on an aquarelle. Many structures got lost. That doesn’t count for the second version. Anyway the saturation of the second version of the sky is less fitting to the foreground.

The foreground has only one little flaw. I like the liveliness and that it is contrasty. The problem is, that the shadows are changing very quickly into black. Don’t get me wrong. Shadows have to be black and the rate of contrast is right. It’s just the smoothness of transition.

So in my opinion, you don’t have to do much. Take your second version, make the decision, if you want to give the sky more saturation or desaturate the foreground a little bit. Then make the transitions towards black a little bit smoother and you got a brilliant render.

Did you also use the general mask feathering which can do that…the outer feather of the mask is a sort of fade to zero but the feathering slider is an edge aware setting and you need to check it with the mask overlay to be sure…using feathering and bumping the mask contrast usually makes it hug the edges where as more opacity in the mask opacity (not the module) and less contrast will make the mask reach out more…

1 Like

A further, more powerful approach, this time using basecurve:


IMG_7730_03.cr2.xmp (27,8 KB)

3 Likes

My version…

IMG_7730.cr2.xmp (23,2 KB)

2 Likes

Here my version using darktable, xmp (9.7 KB), and agx-emulsion.
I used two graduated density filters, the top one with a warm tint.

3 Likes