Hi All,
I would like to learn about your approach when you are considering new gear.
Assuming that we all know the gear is just a tool and as such - regardless how good or bad it is - at the end - it is nothing more than a tool.
Most of us are likely not millionaires - so buying new equipment can be of a challenge - balancing between expense and needed or desired parts camera / lens / speed light etc.
Let me try to illustrate…
I have an older canon - 70D
with 2 lenses
https://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Canon/Canon-EF-S-18-135mm-F35-56-IS-STM
and
https://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Canon/EF50-mm-f-1.4-USM-mounted-on-Canon-EOS-70D__895
Overtime - noticed one of the lenses (the 50 1.4) is much sharper than the other (18-135 zoom).
It actually bothers me more than I expected.
While I can’t simply buy new gear - I am hoping one day I would be able to.
So - I want to ask you.
What is your approach when choosing such?
Are you first looking for the camera? Or are you first looking for the lens?
What motivates your decision?
There are thousands of reviews each claiming that one is better than another because of autofocus or speed etc. And the gear for portraits is not going to be the same as sports or wildlife or landscape.
Yet - each makes conscious decisions why they choose what they choose. And I want to learn about this process.
For quite a while I admired a camera like this
Mostly because of the incredible details in a photo like this (high dynamic range, ability to recover the shadows, incredible details in the eyes of the model)
Easy to conclude - full frame and good lens.
I think however this is not the complete story.
Recently I checked
Specifically this picture
Panasonic DC-GH5
LUMIX G VARIO 35-100/F2.8II (zoom lens but apparently a very good one)
20MP Four Thirds sensor (no OLPF)
Yet - the details of the picture are very very good.
I compared further to
full frame with very expensive lens
https://shop.usa.canon.com/shop/en/catalog/rf-50mm-f-12-l-usm-lens
And this is where sadly I think I got lost.
What influences most the pictures that they are so incredibly sharp?
Is it the sensor (like a size)?
Is it the sensor (like manufacturer or year / generation)?
Is it the lens?
What I know is that my 50mm - mounted on my 70D is going to have extremely hard time competing with the above images in details and sharpness. The zoom is not in their class at all.
However - this very same 50 mm - mounted on a newer camera that is full frame maybe actually able to compete.
sharpness changes from 12 to 22
DXO score changes from 22 to 33
https://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Canon/EF50-mm-f-1.4-USM-mounted-on-Canon-EOS-5DS-R__1009
Knowing that my type of photography is
- landscapes
- portraits
- travel
- family
(in no particular order)
What would be your advice in approaching the dilemma when assessing equipment?
Thank you in advance.