Actually it is reddish and not so easy to target specifically.
I think it is faster to take care of it in a pixel editor like GIMP:
You can of course fine tune the result.
Actually it is reddish and not so easy to target specifically.
I think it is faster to take care of it in a pixel editor like GIMP:
Can’t resist a second try.
I have already posted my edit with RT , have no a clue what prog that mysterious edit was done with , so did an attempt with Lightroom. Besides from global adjust , I did add a luminosity mask to play down the overexposed part of the image.
Pretty much the same as my last edit, though yours has less noise than mine, and mine is a bit more contrasty and saturated.
(I know, I know, there’s no point in comparing both programs, each one has its own path…)
Jepp , didn’t mind contrast and saturation too much with my edit.
Noise reduction is still a difficult part of darktable , i guess …
Yes, it is.
The bit that throws me off are the lower left and right corners in the proprietary result which are a lot darker than they should be. But I guess most it does it some color grading desaturating the blues.
But shadow lifting has become much better. Some years ago both dartable and RT was really lacking behind in that.
Maybe he added a vignette …
I can confirm he did
ah, thx
Thanks for sharing that with full history. Looking at your history I learnt that you light up the interesting region by using the color balance to tune the mid tones.
I have 2 questions:
Looks good but I get an error when opening that:
[lut3d] invalid png header from /home/dave/Downloads/Lutify-me-Free-3D-LUTs-Package-1.6.0/Lutify.me Free 3D LUTs Package/3D LUTs/Color Grading LUTs/Standard (Rec709 and DCI P3) LUTs/Color/Polaroid/Polaroid PX-680 Warm 1 --.png
Any idea why? Or is it my system? Seems I get this with other xmps from here as well.