Haven’t touched it… Currently it reads as cldevice_v4_gfx803=1 150 0 16 16 1024 1 0 0.033319 0.000
if I understand correctly what you meant.
l look at numbers in lines such as 1083.313032 [dev_pixelpipe] took 65.222 secs (3.772 CPU) [export] processed diffuse or sharpen LC’ on GPU with tiling, blended on CPU`
However, I did not measure anything. When I looked into the log, there was a line saying that DT had estimated GPU vs CPU and chose CPU for processing (sorry I can’t recall exact wording). And some numbers were given in this statement as estimated processed times.
That’s okey. Will have a look there… or just wait.
UPD: That was the first run of 4.2. May be some surplus or whatever…
Ok, but why, though?
It would make sense to me that I could easily set my preference for this since it is a basic workflow and I have a choice between two equally good options.
Setting up styles seems somewhat roundabout.
Anyway, thanks for giving me all these great options to choose from
Well, I think “avoid atomics” and “micro nap” most probably are a surplus from HD7770/fglrx times. So I did touch these two a decade ago or so… However I doubt these are involved. I may reset them to defaults, though.
Yeah, I agree that sigmoid as default option is a good choice. When someone needs more control in difficult cases one may switch to filmic. So maybe the opportunity to quickly switch by a shortcut or a mouse click will be convenient.
Congrats!! Very nice release, it’s refining version!
I have a doubt, though, the manual seems still not updated. I wanted to start translating it in Italian but I can’t find (for example) the sigmoid page through weblate. Maybe is weblate not updated? Is it still the right tool to translate the manual?
I noticed a change some time ago with a build between 4.1.0 and 4.2
Actually the width of the white frame seems to be the same, but the grey area around it definitely got smaller. I preferred the old size, as it also enabled better checking of middle grey …
Grey width around image is set on preferences, darkroom tab. You can set it as you want. I don’t remember seeing changes for that on darktable code recently.
The white border used to be: d->border_size = 0.125 * d->width;
PR 12462 change it to:
return MIN(1.75 * darktable.gui->dpi, 0.3 * MIN(d->width, d->height));
I think the 0.125 to 0.3 explains the difference from what it used to be. The ISO 12646 goes into details of the view angle, 160cdm luminance, and the colors; but I’m not finding details around the amount of white border.
