I have no intention or interest in playing down the nasty stuff done by China but just a few bulletpoints to show that “rule of law” is very much dependent of the rule and the law. So in itself worth very little.
- War criminals pardoned (mercenaries, not even proper soldiers)
- The refusal of acknowledging international law regarding war criminals
- The whole illegal dragnet surveillance exposed by Snowden
- The legal loop hole of Guantanamo Bay. Legal in only the most technical sense.
- Waterboarding as somehow legal because “it’s not torture when we do it”
- The discrepancy in Police and state repression of demonstrations depending on political views rather than risk assessments and intelligence.
- Gerrymandering, legal but outrageously antidemocratic
The list could of course go on forever.
It’s been proven so many times that the law is a pretty supple and flexible thing and always in the hands of the powerful and the nation state. So are human rights and political freedoms.
I forgot an interesting thing with the US situation. Private companies can be used to circumvent limitations on state powers. Parking apps used by ICE to track immigrants etc. The agencies are allowed to buy what seems be be any data for sale as long as they don’t do the collecting themselves. When like in US and perhaps China the state and police have such insanely high budgets the lines between private and state get real blurry, furry and cozy. The two countries are similar in that way.