This is very interesting around color perception. It made me think of blue skies in photos and how we edit our images.
I ended up at hue 174, apparently true neutral
I had 176 but each time I did it one after the other I kept getting higherā¦ Might be nice to repeat it at home on my calibrated monitor in dimmer conditions than my office to see if I will have different resultā¦
This reminds me of the tennis ball question. About half of people say they are yellow, while the other half say they are green.
On the test, I also get 174, True Neutral.
i am at 173, almost the median. But I am curious what the units actually are, and how they could be mapped to color wavelength.
I guess Iām the outlier then, with 168.
Iāve got 174, neutral
The unit seems to be the Hue value in HSL representation
The article explains itā¦
I think the main point of the exercise is not what number you get, but that we all have a slight different perception of colors.
I can beat that with 167
I guess it heavily depends on the display you are onā¦
Interesstinhly, I had the redshift on my phone on and got higher values with that (170) - I got that low value when I switched it off!
I heard a story that some nation do not even have a word for āblueā in their language and the sky is āgreenā for them.
Edit: okay wow - I took my wifeās phone and got 174. She scored 169 on mine and got on hers 180. I guess I have to try that on my calibrated monitor
175
176-177 on two screens, my laptop (very good color rendering) and my side display (not that good).
I was either biased or started guessing as my number kept going up if I did one test after the other
Me too!
176 on my ācalibratedā monitor vs 175 on ipad with cracked screen. I feel like Iām making comparisons with the previous colour, as in, well itās bluer than that last one
tried again and got 177 and 174ā¦
176 as well.
Unfortunately the article still perpetuates the idea that Homer called the sea āwine-darkā merely because he didnāt have a word for it and not due to poetic, figure of speech, or actual objective reasons. The sea is not always blue(our general modern understanding of blue), depending on a great number of factors(time of day, distance to shore or water depth etc), but that still seems hard for people to understand
āFor you, turquoise is green.ā
Actually, I always called it a shade of blue. But my first thought was hedge your bets and say turquoise. People have been arguing about is it blue or green since for ever.
I hurried through the test, often thinking ācould be eitherā so I donāt think my result counts.
I win, I got the highest score of 182. Now if they gave me the option of cyan as well as blue or green the outcome might have been different.
Did it twice in a row on my laptop: 173, then 179. I spent most of my time thinking āthis is effing turquoiseā, and that I was having to arbitrarily assign one of the names to a color that was clearly on the boundary. I had to, in effect, convince myself that it was one or the other. So to me, at least, it was an exercise in deciding what I would call blue rather than an exercise in identifying that something is blue.
195
āYour boundary is at hue 195, bluer than 99% of the population.ā
Looks like Iāve really got the blues. That must be why Iāve been feeling a bit low recently
To be honest, a few of the samples looked much the same to me. There goes my idea that I was quite good at assessing colour!