Fujifilm X-T10 vs. X-E2

Software RawTherapee
1

Hi all,
I’d would know why the different quality of demosaicing between X-E2 and X-T10, I think they have the same sensor (X-Trans 16.2MP, 4922x3282)
I post the screenshot 1:1, made on RT 4.2.633, neutral profile (demosaic 3-pass)

X-T10:

X-E2:

2

Hi
To facilitate answering your question it would be helpful if you uploaded a sample raw file from each using http://filebin.net/

3

It looks like the dpreview.com test scene.

4

@CarVac Maybe, but devs can spend their time better than searching the web for files :wink:

5

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=fujifilm_xe2&attr13_1=fujifilm_xt10&attr13_2=canon_eos5dmkii&attr13_3=canon_eos5dmkii&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=200&attr16_1=200&attr16_2=200&attr16_3=200&normalization=full&widget=1&x=0.6075867270202486&y=0.6073379353354605

Download links there.

6

@CarVac Thanks for the link! Downloading…

7

One possible reason: Different lenses!

8

I think they use the same lens for their studio test scene.

My hunch is that this patch just happens to be aliasing on the X-Trans sensor and if it’s lined up right it’ll turn out okay, but if it’s lined up wrong it’ll cause problems.

In this case the ACR result (visible on DPR’s comparison tool) shows a similar problem on the X-E2, so I don’t think it’s RT’s fault.

9

@CarVac : X-T10 file is with XF56mmF1.2 R. X-E2 is with XF35mmF1.4 R

10

Huh. I didn’t check myself. That’s very odd.