Pentax ME Super ?
Pentax K1000!
There you are!
So, as promisedā¦
11.dng (25.3 MB)
Of course, licensed under a 
.
My version of it can be alredy found on my website.
Your second one with an old postcard vibe:
dt302.grainy.II.negative.11.dng.xmp (22.9 KB) darktable 3.0.2
2 Likes
Darktable
11.dng.xmp (9.7 KB)
Rawtherapee + Photoflow
exported neutral from rawtherapee with only an exposure boost
11.dng.pp3 (12.5 KB)
In photoflow Iāve used the Gāmic interpreter for the negative inversion like it was recommended in one cineon pdf
http://www.dotcsw.com/doc/cineon2.pdf
negative->density-> log exposure-> linear rgb
-fill i=(i/255);density=log(1/i)/log(10);log_exposure=(density/0.6)-(685/1023*2.048/0.6);(10^log_exposure)*255
11.dng.pfi (21.6 KB)
Blue filter in Gimp
4 Likes
1 Like
I never hardly ever get to work on negative, Itās freshly different, thanks for the opportunity 
I tried to stay on the soft side and moderately grainy ā¦
13.dng.xmp (11.0 KB)
1 Like
Youāre very welcome!
If you never tried analog photographyā¦ well, be careful if you want to, itās a very deep tunnel 
But itās a different world altogether, from the scouting, through shooting, to the print 
Iām glad to see so many nice replies to my second one.
I like them a lot.
And Iāve seen that all of you thus far have experienced these very dark spots popping out on the right, as if some trees were completely black. I took some extra step in my editing to blend them in with the rest of the picture. They are a bit distracting to me, I donāt know where this effect is coming from, but itās already like that in the negative (sort of fully white trees).
I wonder if itās an effect of the film, that maybe is not sensitive to what reflected from thereā¦ It was the first roll of this film I ever shot (Kentmere 400).
1 Like
Yeah, that was a problematic areaā¦
I donāt have any experience with scanning negatives, but could this be a scanner issue? You mention using Kentmere film for the first time, could the scanner need other initial settings than those you normally use?
With this scanner, when set in raw mode, there is basically nothing you can set, a part from the double exposure (scan twice to do noise average). Even the exposure is basically fixed.
Anyhow, Iāve scanned maybe around 100 rolls with this scanner, but this was the first time I scanned a Kentmere, so thatās why I āblamedā the film itself.
EDIT: as further investigation, I took a quick picture of the film itself with the X100V 
To me it seems that these extra dark features are already in the film capture itself.
Yeah, this isnāt a scanner thing, seems obvious once you look at the negative
True. I still havenāt decided if this is an interesting film or notā¦
(and Iām amazed how good a picture of it I could just quickly snap with the Fuji X100V handheldā¦ why do I even bother with the scanner? 
)
So all you really need is a tripod and a cable release? 
yeah, why not? 