The bug seems to be dependent on the size of the correction area. It appears or disappears when I change it.
@Jade_NL JPG 100 Best Quality. But it’s on TIFF 16 Bit too.
Nice one.
Rarely go with a warm look, but here’s my version
DSC_1291.NEF.xmp (15.8 KB)
dt 3.7.0
Thanks for sharing!
1 Like
Never mind. “Warm look” is a registered trademark of mine.
There seem to be some turquois edges on the head.
I mean, rarely go but i think this image is fitting for that look, that’s why I’m still going with that direction 
Yes, my base colour look up adjustment shifting shadow slightly toward bluish/cyan colour.
apostel338,
I like yours.
I thought I was on the same tack as you, with colorbalanceRGB, but added more whites (de-saturated)… different approach to the contrast EQ as well…
I was shooting for “color negative film”… in the feeling.
LOVING this new way of working.
Nice one too. Has some retro film look.
Yes I enjoy lower contrast edits, particularly in the background.
Yes, unfortunately I didn’t notice that until after upload - on laptop I don’t see all highlight detail unless I tilt the screen back, which I forgot to do here. I’m not sure what causes that artifact but am fighting with the software, it often displays around blown highlights in a much more noticeable fashion, and I constantly have to compress history to clear it. Has only happened since 3.6.0.3 (mac). I should upgrade to a more recent development version.
Ok, I’m a little bit behind on Windows (3.6.0.1).
Thanks: that is what I was going for 
It is hard for me not to slide those saturation levers to the left…
If you like it, do it 