HDR with no overdone effect

No, it is a single frame chosen out of nine bracketed shots.

My take with darktable agx build from here: Blender AgX in darktable (proof of concept) - #1817 by priort


AXH13900_02.dng.xmp (14.2 KB)
Harri

2 Likes

Here another edit from me. This time with some colour:

AXH13900_01.dng.xmp (22,5 KB)

Some further treatments in GIMP:

7 Likes

My version…

AXH13900.dng.xmp (22,3 KB)

3 Likes

I couldn’t resist having a go too :slight_smile:

dt 5.2.1

5 Likes

My play with darktable 5.2.1


AXH13900.dng.xmp (9.6 KB)

2 Likes

How do you like this one?

AXH13900.dng.xmp (21.5 KB)

4 Likes

I like it!

1 Like

I’m not entirely sure what I was going for here.


AXH13900.dng.xmp (42.2 KB)

4 Likes

AXH13900-2.jpg.out.pp3 (16,7 KB)

3 Likes

AXH13900.jpg.out.pp3 (16,7 KB)

4 Likes

Hi @Leniwiec

Nice photo and a very odd looking building. Did it get damaged in a fire at some point?

I had a not wholly successful go at brightening both the sky and the overall image in DT5.3 with AGX and some masked colour mangling.


AXH13900.dng.xmp (14.0 KB)

2 Likes

Hello, Terry!
Thank you for your input.

As far as I know, the church has never been damaged by fire - it is just quite old, being built around 1300 A.D.

There are plenty of such structures where I live (Poland, Europe), e.g. in my hometown:
Virtual tour - Cathedral Basilica in Pelplin

darktable version:


AXH13900.dng.xmp (29.5 KB)

i personally don’t like it nearly as much as a version i did in a few min in a propriatary raw editor:

but i’m not even sure if i’m even allowed to post that version (please tell me if i shouldn’t do that i’m quite new to this forum) i obviously did else it wouldn’t’ve been here and i did use it as a preview for the darktable version. the darktable version i like on 1 area more than the other one and that’s the small wall in the foreground

1 Like

Generally we are not interested in this type of thing, especially if you’re not going to elaborate on what you like about it and what you did to achieve it.

1 Like

Hi @Leniwiec

As far as I know, the church has never been damaged by fire - it is just quite old, being built around 1300 A.D.

Thanks! I only ask because the part between the buttresses looks comparatively new, as though it had been rebuilt; but I suppose that’s true for a lot of churches. Quite a few over here in the UK have sections that were built perhaps 6 or 700 years apart :slight_smile:

Thanks for the link, too. What an incredible building!

Oh, that’s entirely possible. I have just learned that at the turn of the 17th and 18th centuries, two side naves were added.