Hi! I’m very interested in who thinks about it and what:
I really like editing the profile picture displayed on the RGB Rec 709 monitor.
Next, I will upload it to sRGB To upload it to instagram. Obviously, the colors will not be the same as they were originally.
When editing in RGB REC 709, I open an additional monitor (an additional window) and put sRGB there and adjust it a little bit.
Is there a way to “Efficiently” transform an image? REC709~sRGB is allowed via Gimp
Set your softproofing profile to sRGB.
Maybe I am missing something, but I am really confused by this assumption, as the gamut of sRGB and Rec 709 is precisely the same.
[the tone response encoding (“gamma”) is different, and the rec 709 is a full signal encoding standard so it has a lot of other stuff, but that is irrelevant for this discussion]
Hi. Thanks for your help! You and your colleagues responded so quickly that I was only able to take screenshots now. I am writing through a translator.
Output data It is set to sRGB And export too.
This is not the best example, but it will be indicative. Obviously, the image corresponds - Therefore, the “processing process is different” … I want to find a way to translate the image qualitatively. And the finished version in sRGB looked about the same as in REC709 RGB. I admit that I do not understand everything, I am just looking for ways to express myself.
The first screenshot is the Workflow.
The second screenshot is the sRGB export.
Hi! Thanks for the reply. I read your link and it really says that they are similar. Let’s figure it out! What do you think about this? ^
Adobe RGB is yet another profile.
It’s not about Adobe. It’s about colors and their interpolation.
You simply shouldn’t set your “display profile” to “linear Rec 709 RGB”, it’s nonsensical.
It’s also not a good idea to set your “working profile” to “Rec 709 RGB” either.
Maybe find another way (there are plenty of other modules to unleash your creativity) instead of messing w/ color management?
Hi! Thank you. That’s why I installed it. I like the way it is displayed when editing and on the screen.
I honestly don’t understand what you are asking for in this topic then. Do you want to replicate a “look” that you have achieved by messing up color management?
I think you shouldn’t mess with colour spaces, unless you know how colour management works and what you are doing when changing a colour space.
Colour management is a purely technical issue, not something to modify for creative purposes: its aim is to ensure that colour information is kept unchanged as far as possible along the whole chain from camera to output medium. And that in a way that is independant of the equipment you happen to use. That means you basically set up your colour management once, and then don’t touch it anymore (except for a few specific reasons).
Using a non-standard colour space just because it looks good on your monitor means you risk breaking the colour management for anyone else looking at your image. At best your image will get an extra conversion to the colour space of whoever is viewing or printing the image, at worst the image will be displayed as if it was already encoded in the expected colour space (usually not good).
