My fun - ART and GIMP version
DSC04603.ARW.arp (11,5 KB)
ART and GIMP jpeg Q90 6.33MB
JpegLi 1.89MB
Can you see the difference
kofa
(IstvĂĄn KovĂĄcs)
May 10, 2024, 3:28pm
42
Since the aim of this topic is not to discuss the different JPG compression methods, I donât think full resolution images are needed.
We had multiple cases where people thought it was a good idea to upload full size jpegs for posts, which gives us 8-23MB! jpeg files.
I think for most discussions it is more than enough to limit our self to 1920x1080 or smaller resolution.
This does not apply to raw files of course.
Also it might also help to not use the âupload fileâ function for image files. just dragânâdrop them into the post.
Thank you in advance
OK. Well in full resolution but only 1.9MB
kofa
(IstvĂĄn KovĂĄcs)
May 10, 2024, 8:42pm
44
Plus 6.3 MB for the non-JpegLi version.
And how can you visually, show the advantages of the new coding format.
The full resolution of the file, and how much % smaller.
Visually, the difference is not noticeable.
Scaled image by 50% 3008x2008 pix => 1.7MB
Same encoded in jpegli format => 475KB