Loneley Tree - perhaps nice in B&W

BY4A3033.CR3 (17.6 MB)

I have several shots of this nice tree. All from a distance (because there was a fence in between me and the tree). On camera, everything looked good, but when home, I noticed all pictures were actually “blurry”, i.e., the branches are not as crisp as I hoped they would be. I’m not sure where this comes from… Was it caused by motion of the camera and too low shutter speed? The diffuse lighting? Aberrations? Diffraction limits of the sensor?! Or is that just normal, for an object that far away with the given lens on an APS-C camera? I guess I got used to the RP always taking crisp shots, because of the full-frame and lower resolution (i.e., larger pixel size) than the R7…

Maybe someone can identify what went “wrong” in this shot :wink:
In the meantime, I think it also gives a nice play-raw! Have fun!

This file is licensed Creative Commons, Non-Commercial, By-Attribution, Share-Alike.

5 Likes

My guess would be its a bit blurry due to slight movement because every part of the image has the same kind of blurryness… but I’m not sure…

This is my edit. I have used capture sharpening, sharpening in DorS module, and an instance of lens deblur in the DorS module. I couldn’t see if you had used AF or MF. I have known of Canon L series lenses that have had focus issues. One of my students had his L series lens replaced twice because it would not focus correctly. It was the third lens he received that worked correctly. This suggests Canon has poor QC control on some of their lenses.

Did you manually focus?
BY4A3033.CR3.xmp (13.9 KB)

4 Likes

no, this was AF and also IS.

Interesting! On my RP I never had issues, but with the R7 I often noticed my images would not be as crisp as with the RP…

yeah, that would be the most probable answer. It were just my shaky hands holding the camera :smiley:

Lovely picture!

My version, hope you like it…


BY4A3033.CR3.xmp (141.4 KB)

6 Likes

[quote=“reox, post:4, topic:56881”]
no, this was AF and also IS.
[/quote

The IS is very good on the R7 especially when combined with the lens stabilisation. I feel your shutter speed was fast enough to prevent shake. I use manual focus a lot on the R7 with focus peaking.

I like your edit./ :slight_smile:
I would definitely say it motion blur - there’s a distinct bit of ‘directionality’ to the blur.

Could just about be a lens issue, but should be easy to check by taking a similar shot on a bright day with a really high shutter speed and see if it’s better.

1 Like

I get this with a lot of my shots, too. I shoot birds with a 150-500 lens and get this similar futzy-ness quite often. It helps a bit if I’m shooting at 350 rather than 500, it definitely helps not shooting wide open (Going from f/6.5 to f/7.1 or f/8 in my case) and I turn off the IS and shoot at 1/500 or 1/320 - I actually find the IS makes it worse at high shutter speeds, though I’m not sure why. What makes the most difference is finding somewhere to prop the lens up as I don’t usually hike with a tripod :slight_smile:

I had a go at editing yours. I’m playing a lot with contrast equaliser to bring out detail without over-sharpening. Also tone equaliser to bring out the scar on the tree and bring down the background a touch.


BY4A3033.CR3.xmp (19.3 KB)

2 Likes

Good play
Used all the tones. And its still colour…

2 Likes


DT 5.4.1: 20260329_BY4A3033.CR3.xmp (10,4 KB)
Greetings!

8 Likes

My version…

BY4A3033.CR3.xmp (27,8 KB)

6 Likes

Nice, it has many possibilities.


BY4A3033.CR3.xmp (23.1 KB)

6 Likes

That is worth looking into.

the branches are not as crisp as I hoped they would be.

Perhaps a silly idea, but could it be caused by what is called Überstrahlung in German? [Presumably corresponding to Halation in English?]

Have fun!
Claes in Lund, Sweden

1 Like

In remembrance of Winter’s end. :slight_smile:

2 Likes