I think you can’t see the difference, as the human is only made with gimp for working in photoshop. But the difference is in details and color and highlights which feel a bit lower quality, the gimp part looks dull-colored when printed on a paper. And it also has less contrast and highlights which is un-noticeable at all if you just see the image not examine it.
It’s very hard to spot differences because the human was created with gimp and background and grass with photoshop, but there is a mistake in the photoshop section, I’ll send an Easter basket* to the first person who finds it.
This was first composited in photoshop, then I noticed that it was having a watermark and I searched for its lot, finally, I was unable to find a solution to remove the watermark, So I just took the image to gimp, removed the watermark, and exported, that’s why it has gimp color profile, and it also shows gimp, in actual it was made in photoshop, but the watermark became a culprit, so I used Gimp just for the sake of simplicity and ease otherwise the same would be very hard for photoshop.
