First of all, thank you for this work which makes things move forward.
The introduction fits me overall (with my understanding of English).
The list of people who have done at least one PR is interesting, it shows that many people have developed something. but two remarks :
-
don’t do the ranking by number of PR/commits, not that I’m looking for any benefit or ego (I don’t care at all), but it shows better the contributions of each one (it’s just a remark)
-
should we not also note the main contributors who (at least in my case, Local adjustments, Abstract profile, Wavelets, Color-correlation automatic white balance, etc.) have been indispensable both to detect upstream of the PR the dysfunctions, and to realize the important change of the documentation (tooltips, Rawpedia, videos) and write the tooltips and Rawpedia in good English
It is probably necessary to leave the links that you put, but it seems to me that the list made by adding the proposals of @Lawrence37 and mine, should clearly appear in simple reading. These proposals which give a summary description of each “novelty” (Local adjustments, Waveform and vectorscope, …, abstract profile, etc.) as well as the developers and contributors seems to me very desirable (rather than only links, which of course must be maintained) to show the evolution of the work and thoughts in progress, and of course for each new feature some screenshots
But once again thank you for this initiative which will improve the communication and I hope (finally) unblock the imbroglio in which we are
Excuse my bad english, and my current very poor contribution due to very serious health problems (and my age 74)
Jacques