None of above but gave it shot anyway:
GIMP scaled 25% then cropped and GIMP NR filter plus G’MIC NR, I forget which. Contrast, brightness and 2 levels of USM applied. I just played.
None of above but gave it shot anyway:
GIMP scaled 25% then cropped and GIMP NR filter plus G’MIC NR, I forget which. Contrast, brightness and 2 levels of USM applied. I just played.
@xpatUSA usually we say a bit about what we have done and what tooling we’ve used.
OK will edit
Hello, in fact I don’t have a precise setting, in general I slide the luminance slider to get a blurred photo without artifacts, and then I gradually bring out the details, until it suits me. In the case of this image I concentrated only on the bird, staying in “conservative mode” knowing that I was going to apply mask-guided smoothing to the rest of the image.
I hope @agriggio maintains his little gem Art for a long time to come.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
In response to @Leniwiec , who uploaded a version developed with DXO, I’m posting a version developed in auto mode with Neat Image (evaluation version), which I’ve just resized with Digikam. It’s certainly not open source, but it does very well in auto mode. I even find it better than DXO on this image (less smoothing) and it has the huge advantage of also being able to be installed on Linux.
There are a few out of the box approaches worth combining in cases like this
I didn’t waste any time in proper mask drawing and didn’t touch the black level:
2024-08-30_11-02-04.89_DSC0728.nef.xmp (33.9 KB)
Just concentrating on a general noise reduction. Not a partly one, but over the whole picture. This is the best I could achieve, without giving away to much details:
100% view:
Yes 100% luminance correction then bring back the detail seems to achieve the best noise reduction and detail in RT and ART. Seem to remember seeing some advice to do this somewhere and getting better results but this was a long time ago so I can’t remember where.
The image is quite good for that iso. One has to be very careful not to interfere too much with the fine details. I would rather leave some noise.
Here my try with raw and profiled denoise plus hot pixels (!).
Thanks for the opportunity to play with an interesting image!
Key ingredients for my edit:
looks better than mine. Will have a look at your XMP.
Ya it was good to know. I had not explored using it that way………Thx for the feedback….