Salisbury cathedral...denoising

Hi all. I’m interested to see how you approach denoising this image of Salisbury cathedral on a rainy night, handheld.

Thanks


DSCF0282.RAF.xmp (12.2 KB)
DSCF0282.RAF (22.3 MB)

This file is licensed Creative Commons, By-Attribution, Share-Alike.

7 Likes

I fiddled with the settings in Denoise (profiled), then used Diffuse and Sharpen’s Denoise: Fine preset. Maybe not great, but a lot better.


DSCF0282.RAF.xmp (10.3 KB)

4 Likes

I used denoise (profiled) , diffuse & sharpen (denoise medium) as well as a custom adjustment in contrast equalizer. I find every image seems to need it’s own denoise treatment so I pretty much start from scratch every time I have a photo with noise.

On a side note - it really is amazing to see what can be achieved with a high ISO such as 6400 compared to a few years ago.

DSCF0282.RAF.xmp (10.6 KB)

2 Likes

Thanks. D&S does make a difference, but since my laptop lacks a dedicated graphics card so D&S does take a while (depending on settings) - but not so much as to be unusable.

Thanks. I like the way you’ve added a touch of sharpening to the denoise in contrast equalizer.

I bought a Fujifilm X-H2S a while ago, and while it’s excellent for wildlife I still like to use the venerable X-H1 for stuff like this. It’s amazing how much detail can be dredged out the shadows with the older sensor. Edit to add…lots of details in the shadow from the X-H2S sensor as well, but there’s maybe 1\3 to 1\2 stop more noise with the (stacked) X-H2S sensor.

1 Like


DSCF0282.RAF.xmp (17,7 KB)

5 Likes

My version…
RawTherapee 5.11 + Gimp.

3 Likes

DSCF0282.RAF.xmp (17.2 KB)

2 Likes

Here’s a version with bloomed highlights and denoised shadows:


DSCF0282.RAF.xmp (37.8 KB)

8 Likes

Here is my effort deliberately avoiding the DorS module as you don’t have a GPU.
DSCF0282.RAF.xmp (14.5 KB)

5 Likes

Tried a combination of classic and wavelet denoise here. And then “denoise by downscaling” :face_with_hand_over_mouth:
Sure not the best result, but I tried not to lose too many details


DSCF0282_RT-1.jpg.out.pp3 (15.5 KB)

6 Likes

With Art 1.24.5

4 Likes


DSCF0282.RAF.xmp (12.6 KB)

3 Likes

DSCF0282.RAF.xmp (19.0 KB)

More denoised (masked).

5 Likes

I’m bad at denoising. Just use profiled one with some tweakings.


DSCF0282.RAF.xmp (28.3 KB)

2 Likes

DSCF0282_01.RAF.xmp (23.0 KB)

A little off-topic, an experiment with the DxO PureRAW 3 noise suppressor, in the menu - the Deep Prime XD algorithm, then the usual editing in RT:

3 Likes


DSCF0282.RAF.xmp (23,4 KB)

1 Like

RawTherapee 5.11 for most of the edit, GIMP 2.10.38 just to see how some of the “enhance” filters are working. Rarely go this deep into editing an image, i used to use a Nikon D7100 as my primary camera, so low light/high ISO was a hot stove I learned not to touch haha.

1 Like

Ugh, I didn’t really look at the image after I resized it down to 1080x1600, and converted to .jpg. And also didn’t think GIMP actually improved the image in a noticeable way, so here’s the version right out of RawTherapee 5.11, I only used GIMP to crop, resize, and export as a .jpg.