My take
DSC_5534_01.nef.xmp (18.1 KB)
1 Like
I tried to duplicate @agriggio style using DT 3.4 but I missed some aspect of it, mainly managing the luminance contrast on the houses in the shadow part (and to a lesser extend in the lighten part)
DSC_5534_01.nef.xmp (37.1 KB)
I was fairly pleased however to see how cranking the exposure up and activating filmic with default settings did the job (kind of)
2 Likes
I maybe late to the party but I really liked this image and wanted to see if I could match the original version of @gadolf.
So here’s my take, using dt 3.4.1, trying to use the minimum amount of modules. I have used the standard ones (exposure, filmic, color balance and local contrast), plus another exposure instance with a parametric mask to boost the shadows; basically my intention was to replicate what Gustavo did but using a parametric mask instead of the drawn one. I think the shadows are boosted in a natural and seamless way:
This is the sidecar:
DSC_5534.nef.xmp (17.4 KB)
And for those that cannot be bothered to load the image and sidecar in dt, here’s the parameters for the second exposure module:
1 Like