I can’t find out for myself since RawPedia is down.
Does anyone know if RawTharpee supports Adobe Photoshop RAW format?
I’m trying to access the images from this site: Index of /data/lo/LO_1001/DATA
The documentation says:
These images may be opened with Photoshop, or any other program capable of reading a “.raw” file. The only requirement would be that once the image is downloaded from the PDS, the file extension “.IMG” would have to be changed to “.raw” to be read by those programs. Labels may be read outside of NASAView with any text edit application such as TextEdit or Text Wrangler.
They are not Photoshop raw files. Don’t think there even is such a thing. And Adobe raw files would normally be DNG.
Haven’t tried to download one to check, but from the bit of documentation that you quoted (it would be nice with a link), it sounds like it’s just “raw” pixel data with no headers. As such ImageMagick should be able to convert them to whatever format you want.
While ImageMagic is installed on my computer (linux Mint), and I have determined that it is supposed to be a command line tool run with the “magick” command, I get the following when I try and run it:
magick
Command 'magick' not found, did you mean:
command 'magics' from deb magics++ (4.10.1-1)
command 'magic' from deb magic (8.3.105+ds.1-1.1)
Try: sudo apt install <deb name>
Your suggestion to try Gimp was a good one. I had to rename the file with a “.data” extension, then I could use the LINES, and LINE_SAMPLES numbers from the associated LBL file for width and height, and choosing the correct other items, to get the picture to load into Gimp.
Looks like I may have to tweak the images a bit since they did not align the strips of image as precisely as I’d like, but now I have a way forward.
Thank you.
I was looking at the imagemagick documentation online, and their examples used “magick”.
Typing “convert” gets a help message, so it is found on my system.
This is one of my pet peeves with Linux. They have a nice package installing system, but it is very vague on what various packages do. I look to install something, and there will be 4 or 5 packages with very similar names and similar vague descriptions. But when it is a command line tool, very often the actual command line command is nothing like the name of the package, and it almost never tells you what the command line commands it installs are.
In this particular case, there were three ImageMagick packages, two were installed, one was not. Since magick (the documentations command) did not work, I installed the third. This third installed a very primitive gui that could be run from the menus (not that the description mentioned a gui, the option just showed up in the menu) that I could not figure out how to use (the help menu did not). Installing this third package did not make the magick command work.
How am I supposed to guess that installing “ImageMagick” gets me the “convert” command if the convert command is not in the documentation?
But this thread has gone way off topic. The Gimp solution gets me what I need.
In this case the command used to be convert, but changed to magick with version 7 in 2016. This is why current documentation doesn’t use convert. But Ubuntu (and thus Mint) will often stick to an older version for way too long, which is what happened here.