I noticed by chance that the preset for this sensor does not correspond to what a large number of vendors of this OSC camera publish.
The only preset that currently corresponds to the one in Siril 1.4.1 is the ZWO 678C sensor.
I sent an inquiry to ZWO to clarify the difference.
Using the sensors from Touptek, QHY, DwarfIII, etc. as examples.
and the sensor from Zwo ASI678C
Hello. If you find an error, do not hesitate to open a MR in the siril-spcc-database repository.
Also, you can add new data using it: Contribute to SPCC Database — Siril 1.4.0 documentation
I am not sure if this is an error because the diagram in Siril corresponds to that of the ZWO ASI 678 C diagram.
If I receive a response from ZWO, I will contact them again to resolve the issue.
I received a response from ZWO on this topic which, viewed in this context, seems relatively problematic.
All manufacturers argue that their sensor data is correctly displayed, but that there are still differences in the diagrams for some types.
This is the case with the IMX 678C Starvis 2 and should be explicitly noted in the database.
According to the ZWO calculation document, the question is of course how this generally applies in the SPCC.
QE Curve vs. Relative response Curve in Astronomy Cameras.pdf (521.4 KB)
What type of evaluation diagram is the SPCC designed for?
