What do we have here? A friend from the camera club recently acquired a Pixii camera, which he yesterday loaned to me.
We went out for our weekly photo walk through Regensburg at night. There’s a light-show festival going on at the moment.
It’s a lovely piece of engineering. Sleek lines, a reassuring heft. Not the most comfortable thing to hold, but clearly designed with intention and an eye for good design.
There’s a shutter button, a manual aperture ring and focus ring on the lens, an unmarked shutter speed dial, a menu button, and a selection wheel. That’s it. If you set it to auto ISO, that’s just barely enough.
Hold the menu button to turn it on, focus, shoot. That’s all there is to it. A faint (fake) shutter sound confirms that you took a shot. It takes a bit too long for comfort to turn on, but shooting times are snappy and the camera is responsive.
P0001249.DNG (38.4 MB)
Of course the rangefinder focusing took a few minutes to get used to. Of course I shot a few dark frames with the lens cap still on. But after the initial adjustment, it went well.
It is a quirky camera indeed. That menu would really benefit from one or two more buttons. The frame lines were way too bright at night, so much so that I couldn’t really see what I was focusing at.
P0001284.DNG (38.1 MB)
But amazingly, many of the shots turned out quite well. There is a beautiful simplicity to this style of shooting that is unlike anything else.
And I was surprised at the file quality as well. Many of these shots were little more than blackness when I opened them in darktable, and had to be pushed several stops. They did however contain a good amount of usable data, and noise levels were very acceptable for an APS-C sensor.
Actually, this is a fun little camera. For some reason, I’m enjoying it more than the Leica M240 I had tried last year.
Feel free to play_raw this thread under the terms of the CC-NC-BY-SA license. (If you do, you will notice that the white balance went absolutely wild with these images. A daylight-adjacent rendering, such as above, is realistic).
















