darktable 4.6.1
IMG_20240318_172121_03.dng.xmp (19.0 KB)
My gut says to do something like @Popanz. So, for something completely (?) different:
Can’t say that this was easy. Bringing the thistles into the limelight meant Isolating them from the background was quite a challenge. Had to do a lot of back and forth with several modules as the xmp file will tell you. Here’s my attempt
IMG_20240318_172121.dng.xmp (22.3 KB)
So I dabbled at color work and sharpening and cropping and framing (the framing color pickers don’t seem to work right), and I’m not sure I learned anything, except how to waste time.
darktable-4.7.0+910.
IMG_20240318_172121_24.dng.xmp (21.6 KB)
Overall I think it looks very nice to me.
The challenge for me in this photo having not seen the original location was how green/lush was the grass or was it more dry and scrubby if that is a even a word… I felt like it would be on the drier side but many edits have added a lot of color.
A thing stood out catching my eye is the cotton fluff in the foreground and I like it when its whiter as I think it looks more natural. I could see some cast in your image so I just used an instance of color balance with the picker on the fluff.to neutralize that in the bottom half of the photo as you edited it and with that small touch I really liked your edit…
I see what you mean about the cast, an d I agree it should be whiter. Thanks for the feedback. I keep watching Boris’ videos on color, and I think I understand it while I am watching, but when I go to edit a photo, I feel lost. So I try this and I try that. I suppose if I do that enough, something will click in my mind eventually.
I really liked what you arrived at with the sky and building. The CC on the fluff I added was nice for the foreground but messed up the sky so I just masked it out and I really like what you did… so again I don’t think you wasted your time