I will be replacing my aged (10+ years) monitor with a 1680x1050 resolution.
The two candidates are summarized below:
A) 24", 1920x1200 pixels, ~10bit, Adobe RGB coverage 99% (DCI-P3 coverage 95%)
B) 24", 2560x1440 pixels, 8bit, DCI-P3 coverage 95% (Adobe RGB not mentioned).
I am just over 60. Other than routine uses (Internet browsing, reading/writing etc.) the monitor will be used for image processing. For raw images, that means darktable most of the time.
I print occasionally and I will probably be printing more in the coming months. I should be happy to anticipate the look of my prints with less trial&error.
My questions are :
- Considering ergonomics, should I opt for more resolution or more panel color bit depth?
- What does the coverage of 95% of DCI-P3 (? Display P3) color space mean for a darktable user?
The price difference between these monitors -of different brands- is not significant.
Note: I hope, this message is not taken as irrelevant as it might seem to be on hardware. For me, it is definitely on darktable because I wouldn’t be replacing my monitor if I wasn’t starting to be able to use darktable with a much better understanding of it nowadays.