I just found the error (or at least one of them)
In your preset.json change maker to XIAOYI
(judging from the only raw sample image that I have found).
Good luck!
Claes in Lund, Sweden
I just found the error (or at least one of them)
In your preset.json change maker to XIAOYI
(judging from the only raw sample image that I have found).
Good luck!
Claes in Lund, Sweden
Thank’s I’ll try that when i get home from work.
Didn’t work, the camera name in the lens correction module changed to “generic crop sensor (2.00x)” but still no noise profile in the denoise module
Is that actually the path to your newly generated presets.json file?
This is peculiar! It works just fine on my machine.
Here are the steps I took:
/opt/darktable/bin/darktable --noiseprofiles ./presets.json
Now, there is another thing that bothers me… I suspect that my sample image and your images do not report maker in the same way! Your dump (above) reports maker YI TECHNOLOGY. My sample reports maker XIAOYI.
Isn’t life puzzling?
Have fun!
Claes in Lund, Sweden
@Claes interesting. I’ll try it with the sample wwhen I get home. Also, I suspect the difference in maker may be due to the DPReview samples being taken with early firmware, while I’m on the latest one.
This sounds strange. Why would the lens correction module change when editing the noise profile data? What exactly did you do to change the maker?
I’ve changed the maker
field in pretests.json
to YI TECHNOLOGY
as that is what is reported in my DNG file.
Here is my presets.json
:
{
"version": 0,
"noiseprofiles": [
{
"maker": "YI TECHNOLOGY",
"models": [
{
"comment": "m1 contributed by mica@silentumbrella.com",
"model": "M1",
"profiles": [
{"name": "M1 iso 100", "iso": 100, "a": [1.10711453293077e-05, 4.5553049100813e-06, 1.00316690340124e-05], "b": [-4.13243840571984e-10, 9.05781134283873e-09, 3.41324581919006e-08]},
{"name": "M1 iso 200", "iso": 200, "a": [1.10476862785712e-05, 4.55166027805942e-06, 9.61731856173001e-06], "b": [1.71033267821898e-08, 1.26022105005497e-08, 2.78265979780639e-08]},
{"name": "M1 iso 400", "iso": 400, "a": [2.1431686899096e-05, 8.68606734792238e-06, 1.833514118073e-05], "b": [2.13227367322229e-08, 2.61654826555548e-08, 6.34335556927895e-08]},
{"name": "M1 iso 800", "iso": 800, "a": [4.10928259840626e-05, 1.68942240848889e-05, 3.56925638897857e-05], "b": [6.83307060087334e-08, 5.88159491597772e-08, 1.27285727863453e-07]},
{"name": "M1 iso 1600", "iso": 1600, "a": [8.13184188347158e-05, 3.34187840992974e-05, 7.26354852980862e-05], "b": [1.93897140543902e-07, 1.5257620830091e-07, 2.42951564559548e-07]},
{"name": "M1 iso 3200", "iso": 3200, "a": [0.000167691097936184, 6.80753718157227e-05, 0.000148687911877462], "b": [4.34429630877549e-07, 4.15445996975158e-07, 4.43719759326219e-07]},
{"name": "M1 iso 6400", "iso": 6400, "a": [0.000356457116722712, 0.000147588142592895, 0.000311292370801957], "b": [8.55254329452434e-07, 9.74046195035361e-07, 7.16209612055463e-07]}
]
}
]
}
]
}
The profiled denoise should be added in 2.6 for the Yi M1.
sweet, thanks
My version above is missing the two highest isos, I will update it today.
Don’t be so pessimistic
That’s what the bug report said last time I looked at it
I’ve already added it to my json file locally. It is working well.
Hi, @paperdigits.
Sorry for the OT, but I would to know your thoughts after some time using this nice little camera.
I have a Canon EOS 1100d, not an high end model, do you think that changing to yi m1 would be a mistake, or quality is not so bad?
This while I’m trying to find a good offer for a 1st mark of Sony alpha7
Hi @Dario_M,
I like this little camera pretty well. I recently went to Mexico for 3 weeks and it was my only camera. Obviously the size is great for travel. I had heavily considered a Sony, but I hate Sony software and they always seems to be doing something strange (memory stick, star eating, bizarre file formats historically) so I passed on the Sony.
I aimed for this camera to replace my phone camera, which is horrible.
The down points of this camera, in my opinion are:
The good:
Ultimately, I had $100 in amazon points, which made this a super cheap purchase. It’s hard to argue with the price point.
Perfect, thanks.
If you have any specific questions or want some specific (within reason) sample from the camera, please don’t hesitate to ask.
Thanks. I would like to understand if it could be an upgrade from eos 1100d in term of quality of raw.
1100d is not one of the best camera especially at iso above 400.
Even if equally performing, m1 could be a choice, for the weight.