Hey @rob and @jakubf! Welcome to pixls.us community!
Good news for @rob and @jakubf - thanks to your samples it seems that Sony’s camera data works flawlessly!
Good news for @rob and @Thomas_Gulmark - thanks to your samples it seems that Pentax’s camera data works flawlessly!
Now I need just a bit more samples from Samsung, Panasonic, Olympus and others
It seems like Samsung has reverse situation than Fuji - meaning produces proper WB data but does not indicate finetuning.
Can you DM me those RAW files so I can check them locally? And tell me what exact WB preset you’ve used, because it seems like camera is insisting it was “Manual”
It’s now confirmed for me - Fuji doesn’t put wb fineadjusted coefficients in exif file can you send me 3 raws with same image content, same wb preset but fineadjustment as in post #1? (-9, -8, 0)? I want to see if decoded raws are different or “as shot” wb differs…
@wiegemalt - thanks! Olympus is now confirmed to working fully
Currently in darktable Olympus cameras you have have following WB presets levels:
EM-1 Mark1: Only non-finetuned, not including Kelvin presets
E-PL1: Interpolated finetuned
TG-5: doesn’t have white balance presets
Would you like to do shots with finetuning and contribute them to darktable?
But I’m still confuse…my camera is a Fuji, so the fine tune is like this image
So should I go from horizontal line (R: -9: B: 0 to R:9 B: 0) diagonal up (R:- 9, B :-9 to R: 9 B: 9) diagonal down (R:-9, B: 9 to R: 9 B: -9) or the whole square (200 shots…!!!)
Unfortunately fuji does not produce usable finetuning info. Your only option is to just create presets without finetuning. If you did finetuning here’s the message you’d receive from extract_wb tool:
Warning: Fuji does not seem to produce any sensible data for finetuning! If all finetuned values are identical, use one with no finetuning (0)