Following the tradition, darktable 2.6 was released for Christmas.
2018 has been a year of renewal for darktable, with many major
features introduced by recent contributors.
amazing release. the filmic module allows me to do things I was never able to figure out in DT. but on top of the awesome work from @anon41087856, there are small UI tweaks I really appreciate in my workflow. my favorite, long-time, wishlist items are scrollbars and the better handling of rating in “grouped” mode: while there was a plugin to rate groups of images before, it never quite worked as well as the normal rating module. now I don’t need that plugin at all anymore, so kudos for that.
congrats again to the whole team, an awesome release!
I totally agree. This is really a great release. Particularly the filmic and retouch modules mean a big step forward when it comes to processing my architecture shots
filmic because it allows such a great tone mapping and it became much more convenient to achieve the bright but still contrasty tones. (Nevertheless, it is great for so many pictures!)
And retouch allows to get rid of a lot of distracting stuff. And it is really astonishing how powerful it is. Not sure, if I could benefit from the frequency separation in architecture photography. But even without using this feature it gives great results.
Thank you very much for your outstanding work in the new release.
In the linked article “Filmic, darktable and the quest of the HDR tone mapping” there are some “Proper settings examples” for the filmic module. Is it possible to include them as module presets in darktable (I mean in the installation package)?
This would make the life of beginners easier since they can get ideas of how to use a module without learning the complex backgrounds of a module.
The development version, 2.7, has filmic presets and the saturation sliders have been reworked. So, if you can compile the git version of darktable then you can have them otherwise they probably wont be out until the next bug fix release (maybe).
I am able to build it on 16.04, so technically there seems no obstacle. I just did not manage to find Pascals email address yet to ask him. Could you please find his address and ask?
K, sorry @aequalis, please ignore my stupid advice and do not contact Pascal. Isn’t there another source for ubuntu packages, with Opensuse or something similar? I have to research tonight … I would be happy to find a source as well, since I do not want to use my self compiled version for my production database, since I may have done something wrong.