filmic rgb - call to overhaul the docs

While getting the translations of the docs running I stumbled upon filmics docs being almost incomprehensible in parts.

Maybe there is someone in the community who is fluent in filmic and would be willing to make the whole doc more concise and understandable. It could probably do with removal of all the references to base curve etc. as well.

See also this thread.

If you are interested feel free to get the axe out, have at it and open a PR against dtdocs. If you are new to working with the docs/git there is a comprehensive guide in the docs. If you need help feel free to ask me for help :slight_smile: .

4 Likes

Maybe I’m going to be harsh, but why don’t you start the PR with the edits/proposal and then ask for feedback on those edits?

Because I am currently investing quite some amount of time in the docs as it is - so I thought maybe there would be someone willing to help with filmic :slight_smile: .

9 Likes

I opened a PR with an overhaul. Would be grateful if some of you guys who are using filmic gave it a read-through.

1 Like

Looks good to me. I appreciate the factual corrections. And I really appreciate the guidance from the Ansel docs.

Thanks for working on this.

1 Like