I’ve always organized my images by folders and I never rename the images. So my structure is like this:
.
├── 2020
│ ├── Name_of_the_Job_One_2020_001
│ │ ├── 5Dmk4
│ │ ├── 77D
│ │ ├── GH5
│ │ ├── Inspire1
│ │ └── Mavic2Pro
│ ├── Name_of_the_Job_One_2020_002
│ │ ├── 5Dmk4
│ │ ├── 77D
│ │ ├── GH5
│ │ ├── Inspire1
│ │ └── Mavic2Pro
│ └── Name_of_the_Job_Two_2020_001
│ ├── 5Dmk4
│ ├── 77D
│ ├── GH5
│ ├── Inspire1
│ └── Mavic2Pro
└── 2021
├── Name_of_the_Job_One_2021_001
│ ├── 5Dmk4
│ ├── 77D
│ ├── GH5
│ ├── Inspire1
│ └── Mavic2Pro
├── Name_of_the_Job_One_2021_002
│ ├── 5Dmk4
│ ├── 77D
│ ├── GH5
│ ├── Inspire1
│ └── Mavic2Pro
└── Name_of_the_Job_Two_2021_001
├── 5Dmk4
├── 77D
├── GH5
├── Inspire1
└── Mavic2Pro
Now this is great but sometimes I wish I had it sorted by client names. Then again what if there are multiple clients for the same job etc. My system has a flaw where I cannot import my job directory and that darktable imports it recursively but instead I have to import all single directories for each camera and I end up with a bunch of camera directories in lighttable and those are not grouped by the job directories. So a film roll can’t show a job directory. I can use folders but it’s clunky.
And even if it did import recursively I’m afraid it would then also import the darktable_exported directories and that would be a different issue…
I’d much rather adapt to Darktable then trying to fight it.
So I’d like if everybody could share their organization systems, maybe we could all benefit from each other.