[Capture Challenge] Charge your battery and take some photos

Is it? :laughing:
The chrome bar on the side looked different in the pictures I found

1 Like

16 Likes

Is that a double exposure?

1 Like

No, it is a single shot.

1 Like

Ah, ok. It looked like one of the birds was in front of the net so I guess that’s to do with it being out of focus and semi-transparent.

It’s an intriguing shot, like there’s some kind of uncertain connection between the flock and the ripping of the net. Or that’s just me

3 Likes

Amazing composition and building. I could totally see people climbing or rappelling from it in a movie or TV production.

I wonder how they mitigate fire risk in such a large grain storage facility.

It’s not just you, I also see an intriguing image. In fact I have an image without the birds and it’s not the same.
In the development I tried to convey that intrigue. A broken net and a flock of flying birds.

In this image, the birds will not pass through the frame. It is not developed, but I share it to show that without the birds, the meaning is not the same.

6 Likes

That’s a powerful demonstration. I suppose we try to make meaning from an image. In the second, it’s obviously a broken basketball net and that’s it. Job done. The first is ambiguous and for some reason in this particular image it’s not just ā€œhere’s two random things in the worldā€, even though we kinda know that’s exactly what it is. In that way, it feels a bit like one of those optical illusions (rabbit or duck). We know it’s one thing but we can’t help see it as something else at the same time. I’m not sure what it is about the elements here that does that. Maybe that the hoop is up in the air and so are the birds and it’s possible to imagine the birds sitting on the hoop or even tearing the net. Or that it’s just trying to figure out why these have been put together in one image. Maybe the scale as well. The birds are so tiny but in focus so in a sense they’re the subject, while the net is soft and so secondary, implying the birds were here with us and the net and now we’re watching them fly away. I don’t know

3 Likes

Thank you very much for your text. I don’t know how to explain it better.
I can only add a bit of context and my feelings.
During a walk with the camera I decide to take a photo of that basket, but when I turn around, I see a flock of birds coming towards my position.
I positioned myself with the same framing as the previous photo, hoping that some of those birds will pass through that frame.
When some of those birds passed through the frame, they were captured, while others were not captured, because they escaped from the net.
My follies…:see_no_evil:

Traducido con DeepL Translate anytime, anywhere with DeepL apps and extensions

2 Likes

I like the small DOF on your picture :smiley:

Another mountain sunset picture while the snow is still there :grinning:

17 Likes

From my old LX7. In JPG mode, using electronic shutter, it can spit out 40 fps.

18 Likes

40 fps is really impressive.

1 Like

The two circled over my head for minutes.

6 Likes

Excessive?

15 Likes

ā€œHe spent most of his life in a pub next to this neoclassical columned stove, on which the landlord erected this monument.ā€

9 Likes

The lakes reflection caught my eye yesterday and I found this wreckage after a short walk down the beach. I’ve been struggling a bit lately with photography as I’m trying to change how I compose… But this little walk yesterday reaffirmed that I don’t need to reinvent how I shoot, I just need to let things happen and try not to force something.

18 Likes

9 Likes

Like this combination. I’d defo be revisiting that wreck when the light was low in the sky and less contrasty.

1 Like

Testing my new 120 EUR 35 mm prime.

13 Likes