Editing moments with darktable

New episode: color harmonies part 4:

32 Likes

Thanks a lot grand jedi master @s7habo for this new episode. :blush::+1:

7 Likes

I looked this new episode yesterday : awesome :+1: :pray:
Merci beaucoup.

1 Like

Nice and thanks for introducing the new Primaries RGB module.

A side note, you may want to use the Duplicate module in the darkroom for duplicating the pictures (avoiding to go back to lighttable). Also, it is a nice way to compare multiple duplicates by just clicking on one of the duplicate image in the module.

3 Likes

OMG I completely forgot we have this option. Thanks for reminding me!

3 Likes

New Episode: Revisiting channel mixer:

Because many continue to have difficulties with channel mixer, I decided to bring it up again with the hope that it might make it easier to understand.

In this episode I also took a couple of raw files from our play-raw category:

_MG_7291.CR2
Copyright: Jimd
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed | Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International | Creative Commons
Used from: Flowers, dark background

0L0A3314.CR2
Copyright: Brian Poindexter
Lizense: CC BY-SA 4.0 Deed | Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International | Creative Commons
Used from Darktable: filmic V5 vs V6 sunflower challenge

23-04-29__MG_2940.CR2
Copyright: Jimd
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed | Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International | Creative Commons
Used from: Didnt want that new lens anyway...

27 Likes

Thank you @s7habo for this very clear explanation of the channel mixer (with practical examples too). This really helped me and I now feel like I have a better understanding of how it works and how to apply it with my photos

1 Like

Thanks for this very clear episode.
There is just one point which I didn’t fully understand, when you set the red and green channel to zero (at about 5 minutes) and add input red/green in the blue channel. Isn’t it just a multiplication of the blue values with the values of red or green in the same pixel. But if the red or green values are set to zero why do you get positive blue values in these areas, shouldn’t they remain black (multiplication by zero)? Must probably be a more complex operation?

https://docs.gimp.org/en/gimp-filter-channel-mixer.html

2 Likes

Thanks, it’s an addition in proportion of the percentage of the input channel. Also, when you set red/green to zero, then the output is set to zero, i.e. black, but the input values are still there and those are used for calculating the new output value.

1 Like

Thanks Boris, I think I finally get it. Now I need to practice this on my own photos.

The way you analyse the colors in a photo and have a clear vision of what look you want the final image to have is something I have to improve on as well. The changes you make seem very subtle but in the end it surprises me how much it improves the photo.

Thanks for all the time you spend making these videos!

4 Likes

Hello Boris,
thanks for your videos and your tremendous activities. I’ve learnd so much about photo editing from you. It’s always a pleasure.
But now I have a problem. in the last weeks I selected my photos I’ve taken in holydays. And now I want to edít them for a little book. But in the meantime I’ve watched your videos about color harmonies an I am excited. And now I’m hooked.
But so it takes a long more time to edit my photos. But without the color harmonies, I’m no longer satiesfied with the pictures. But what’s the solution therefor?
The solution will be to edit more and more photos and to understand to work with channel mixer and how it works.

By the way I have found an articel about adjusting color with channel mixer also based on your and Nicolas Winspeare videos. I think this can also help to understand an to achieve the desired results. The artice is in german language but nowadays it’s no problem to translate within the browser in several languages.

So, these were my thoughts in the last days. Hope you will go on to take me on the editing tour even though it’s stressfull (for me). Once again, thanks!
Thomas

6 Likes

I am probably stupid, but is there a text tutorial on this stuff, anywhere? I can’t always tell what Boris is doing in the videos. He says what he’s doing, clicks somewhere, and magic happens. I can’t tell what he clicked on to do that. I’m not a video learner; I’d rather have written instructions.

I can display the vectorscope, but then I do not see how he gets the complementary colors controls (the pie shapes that cross in the middle) to even open. I have read the vectorscope sections in the documentation, and they don’t even seem to mention it.

In short, I can’t get past square one in trying to use color harmonies. I will try to watch the first video again, but I would profit more from some readable instructions.

3 Likes

I’ve been writing some text-based tutorials here. I have plans to do more, but am limited on time. The most recent one, Changing Colors, covers some of this material with the channel mixer but nowhere near the level of depth as these video tutorials.

2 Likes

The vectorscope has 3 modes:

  • Luv
  • AzBz
  • RYB
    The colour harmonies overlay is only available in RYB. Switch between the modes using the left of the two icons on the top right:

    The one next to it is the toggle between linear and logarithmic view.
3 Likes

About the channel mixer, Boris made this written mini tutorial:
channel mixer

2 Likes

Thank you. I figured that out after rewatching the first video in the series. I figured out how to map the color points, too.

Now, I just have to figure out how to know what to do with them. :smiley: I think in Boris’s second example, he changed the hanging leaves from a maroon color to burnt red. I don’t think I would ever have such an idea. I don’t know why Boris had such an idea, although the end result looked great.

The vectorscope display I got on my first attempt did not fit the complementary configuration, either. So I will need to watch more of his examples to see how to deal with images like that.

I guess I just need a lot more time to digest all of this.

2 Likes

I would not, either. I don’t colour grade my photos, I use pretty straight-forward processing most of the time (two diffuse or sharpen instances, one with the local contrast, the other with the sharpen demosaicing AA filter preset; color balance rgb with the basic colorfulness: standard preset; filmic rgb or sigmoid and finally local contrast). I don’t actually think all photos need to be graded, or that one always has to bend a photo to match one of the ‘harmonies’. I understand that for fashion/glamour/product photography, it’s a useful tool, but I mostly shoot landscapes, and if a flower is almost, but not exactly opposite the sky on the vectorscope, I won’t line them up just to boost visual contrast.

7 Likes

Same here more or less, landscapes, too. I’ll spot-adjust tone, hue and saturation but overall color grading is usually limited to cooling shadows and warming highlights mostly. Of course part of the reason I say / do that is because my processing skills are pretty limited. :slight_smile: Maybe that’s kinda like a guitarist saying, “I just play one note solos because that’s what I feel, man!”, when the truth is, that’s all he can play… :laughing:

4 Likes

Yes, I agree, trying to bend colours in landscapes to match colour harmony rules can yield some strange results but perhaps that is just in my incapable hands! Sometimes it works to achieve a stylised result for the right scene though…

1 Like